Governor must get legislative approval on economic development program
Published December 10, 2013
Editorial by Winston-Salem Journal, December 10, 2013.
Gov. Pat McCrory is determined to move many Department of Commerce functions to a public-private partnership, but he should slow down until he determines whether he has the authority to do so.
The News & Observer of Raleigh reported last week that Commerce has developed a reorganization plan that would move dozens of jobs and millions of public dollars to McCrory’s Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina. The department is seeking authorization to pay as much as $1.8 million in separation allowances to 65 Commerce employees.
The state budget directed the administration to begin planning, and planning only, for the conversion to a partnership, the legislators said in a legislative meeting and subsequent interviews. Senate Bill 127 would have provided the additional authority to undertake the sweeping changes Commerce envisions, but that bill did not pass.
Remarkably, a Commerce representative told the committee, the department is proceeding as if the bill had passed, however.
We realize that many McCrory administration officials are new to state government, but they should have learned in sixth grade that a bill is not a law, that the agency cannot proceed along the authority granted under SB 127 until that bill actually passes the General Assembly and is signed by the governor, if, in fact, any of that ever occurs.
With major industrial recruitments and other Commerce-assisted projects under way, the last thing North Carolina needs is the legal confusion that would emanate from an unauthorized department restructuring. The state could be left without a coherent economic development effort while everyone argues over who is in charge.
If McCrory and his budget office don’t stop after the planning stages are finished, then legislative leaders should take whatever actions necessary, including litigation, to stop them.
Legislators wisely stopped short of approving SB 127 so they could see exactly what McCrory’s partnership would involve. That partnership cannot proceed until legislators authorize it, so McCrory should slow down.
December 10, 2013 at 10:22 pm
Meg Conway says:
After reading and posting comment to the NYT article regarding Boeing and its potential move to another state, including NC, I read the above article.
I shouldn't have worried.
Here's my NYT posting:
Boeing Looks Around, and a State Worries
Andy Clark/Reuters
Meg Conway
Asheville NC
Having spent 12yrs living and working in Washington state prior to moving to North Carolina, Boeing definitely needs to take North Carolina off the list.
First, Washington state has Senators Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell. They are inclusive, their focus is the truth and the work, not the spotlight. Senator Murray's work on behalf of veterans is a great example.
Second, moving to NC with its discriminatory insurance common laws and exclusive congressional and judiciary focused on the spotlight is a regressive, harsh, change.
There is an unethical acceptance here of inhumane archaic laws that benefit the wealthy.
In North Carolina if a company, like Biltmore Farms with a CEO, like Jack Cecil, a Vanderbilt descendent, wants to turn his back on someone seriously injured and disabled as result of a hazard his company created on his property, he and his insurance company Hartford Insurance will do everything to find you 1% in your own injury, denying full medical, loss of income, and pain and suffering-even when later found not 1%, "not any" % responsible.
Third, a Buncombe County North Carolina courtroom won't hear a pro se case against Biltmore Farms, they're "just a mess"; and Senator Hagan will reprimand you for contacting her about a state matter.
Fourth and final, read here Boeing
http://www.change.org/petitions/biltmore-farms-llc-jack-cecil-ceo-and-ha...?