From Obamacare to Republicare
Published March 10, 2017
By Tom Campbell
by Tom Campbell, Executive Producer and Moderator, NC SPIN, March 9, 2017.
If we can allow ourselves to tune out the many distractions coming out of Washington (and Raleigh), we might be able to tune into the number one domestic issue of our time – healthcare. Even though 20 million more Americans now have health insurance, most agree the Affordable Care Act (Obamacre) has flaws. It might not be the “disaster collapsing around us,” as some claim, but ACA needs to be reworked. Obamacare has neither significantly improved outcomes nor lowered healthcare costs as envisioned and, despite the mandates, too many remain uncovered.
Republicans ran on a platform to repeal and replace Obamacare, a good sounding campaign pledge but a much more difficult task than they envisioned. Give the House Republicans credit for putting the issue back on the table, but this week’s draft legislation seems to be acceptable to few; it will not lower costs or assure access and is almost guaranteed to result in many losing coverage. The big beneficiaries will be insurance companies. If Republicans can agree on healthcare reform, something that seems unlikely at this moment, count on their plan being hung with the moniker “Trumpcare” or “Republicare,” because they will own it, much as the former president did ACA.
Republicans have the right problem but, so far the wrong solutions. The only plausible and workable healthcare plan we have seen came out of the 2010 Simpson-Bowles Fiscal Responsibility and Reform Commission and deserves resurrecting and reconsideration. Former Senator Alan Simpson and former UNC President Erskine Bowles spent a year in hearings, researching data and hammering out proposals. Bowles outlined the basics of the plan in a 2012 Healthcare Forum for NC SPIN.
Some 18 percent of our Gross Domestic Product is consumed by healthcare, about twice as much as any other country, even though 25-50 other nations have better health outcomes. At its essence healthcare has become a cost-shifting program where every American receives healthcare, whether by an employer or self-paid insurance plan, Medicaid, Medicare or through mandated hospital indigent care. We need to recognize that one way or another taxpayers subsidize healthcare for an increasing percentage of our population. Like it or not, healthcare has become a right of our citizens.
Instead of taxpayers providing Cadillac coverage to everyone, Erskine Bowles says, we need a “pretty good Chevrolet” plan for basic care. Nobody should get first dollar coverage; everyone should have some skin in the game and absorb some of the costs. Everyone should have a patient-centered medical home, focusing on quality rather than quantity of care, a model that would require more primary care physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants.
If we are going to provide healthcare to everyone we must bring down costs of prescription drugs. Simpson-Bowles says nobody would receive name-brand drugs unless a generic drug wasn’t available. Tort reform is also necessary, so that doctors spend less time practicing defensive medicine. Finally, we must have some honest discussions about end-of-life care, not “death panels,” but recognizing that the most expensive healthcare usually occurs in the last few months of a person’s life.
The ultimate solution probably won’t make anyone totally happy and everyone will have to compromise, but it is clearly time to accept the realities and find workable solutions. Simpson-Bowles is better than anything we’ve seen to date.
March 10, 2017 at 10:35 am
T Hauck says:
We keep hearing about the cost of medical care and the 18% of the economy.
I have given you all the details in case you do not or cannot open links. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/health/policy/parting-shot-at-waste-by-key-obama-health-official.html
The link is http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=13444 The 436 pages report lists details of ways to reduce costs while improving care.
In summary, we should be able to write a law that provides patient centered health care that efficiently meets all requirements.
March 10, 2017 at 11:32 am
Richard L Bunce says:
Well a better starting point than the ACA...
Setting aside the issue of how much Federal and State government financial support their should be for healthcare...
First of all healthcare insurance is not healthcare. People can obtain healthcare without insurance. Government can subsidize that healthcare for those unable/unwilling to pay without buying them insurance.
I have a real problem with nobody receives name brand drugs if there is a generic... now that might be acceptable for some who has accepted a government subsidy... the quid pro quo... but if I am paying my own way, with or without my own insurance, then if I choose to pay for the most expensive drug, that is my choice.
This is why just looking at the total US healthcare spending number is deceiving. Should be divided into two sets of data, coerced spending in a government program including subsidies AND voluntary private spending which through cost shifting actually makes some of the of spending lower and perhaps even possible with high end treatments funding research for new product lines when those patents run out.
If people with disposable income want to voluntarily spend it on healthcare that is in no way a sign of a problem with the US healthcare and healthcare finance systems.
Of the ACA's many flaws, one was the mechanism just being too damned complex. No reason not to buy insurance directly with the insurer. No reason not to deal directly with IRS on the tax credit?CSR program eligibility then forward that approval to the insurer. That DHHS has to funnel everything through itself is a design flaw from the beginning.