Charlotte to Raleigh in 22 minutes?
Published January 18, 2019
By Tom Campbell
by Tom Campbell, producer and moderator of NC SPIN, January 17, 2019.
Imagine travelling from Raleigh to Charlotte in about 22 minutes; not by train, plane or car, but instead in a pod, transported through an almost friction-free tunnel. This concept is under experimentation right now, as nearly 1,000 learned last week at the NC Transportation Summit.
Sponsored by the NC Department of Transportation and NC Go!, this day and a half event presented some innovative concepts for future travel, including the aforementioned tunnel and pod, as well as other options being tested, like self-driving or autonomous vehicles, drones and even personal scooters.
But woven throughout the presentations and discussions was the ever-present challenge of how to fund transportation. Approximately 25 percent of North Carolina’s transportation funding comes from the federal government, largely through the Federal Highway Trust Fund. The bulk of that money comes from the federal gasoline tax, currently at 18.4 cents per gallon, a rate hasn’t been changed in 23 years. In 1993, the year the rate was established, tuition at NC State University was $1,500 per year. Last year it was $9,000. You know what has happened with costs in 23 years. Additionally, these revenues are static to declining. And while we hope it is only temporary, the federal government shutdown has halted transportation funds going to states. A growing number have already pulled road construction projects. Fortunately, North Carolina is not in that condition….yet.
Our state also depends heavily on a state gas tax for funding, also facing revenue declines. Today’s vehicles are more fuel efficient and use less gas, there are growing numbers using electric or solar fuel that help little in offsetting costs of construction or maintenance, and the price of gas is dropping, meaning fewer total dollars are being collected. Meanwhile, the addition of 100,000 new residents each year adds to the strain on our roads and traffic congestion. You, like the audience at the Transportation Summit, are probably getting a picture of a transportation system soon to be in crisis.
Gas taxes will likely always be a funding source, however supplemental funds are needed. Among the options are tolls, the mere mention of which raises the dander of most Tar Heels. No elected official who wishes to remain in office is willing to either raise the gas tax to levels needed to build and maintain our roads or to accept tolls. But tolls are coming, likely through public-private partnerships that build optional “hot” lanes on multilane freeways. Motorists can choose to escape congestion by paying a toll. Many favor a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) funding mechanism, but there are privacy issues for folks not wanting “big brother” to know where and how often they drive. Besides, nobody has perfected how to record each motorist’s annual usage or, more significantly, how to bill and collect the taxes from millions of resident motorists, much less visitors using our roads. Then there are dedicated sales taxes, yet another option that generally presents opposition.
North Carolina has 80,000 miles of state-maintained roads, the second largest network in the country. For the safety of our people, the future economic development of our state and the need to efficiently transport people and goods from one place to another, we must find ways to maintain and expand this system. To do so requires adequate funding to help us travel to this future, regardless of which mode we choose.
January 18, 2019 at 2:59 pm
Norm Kelly says:
The crisis is indeed pending. I can't imagine anyone would dispute this.
First, we need to find a way to tax electric/hybrid vehicles since they continue to be an expense for infrastructure. They should not get a free ride.
Second, it's true that tolls and raising taxes are almost universally hated and objected to. Especially when we have socialists at every level of government who want to eliminate persona income thru taxation. (you can dispute that claim but saying that 70% is a good place to start is absurd. saying that bankrupting the nation by forcing socialized medicine upon us, even more than is current, is also absurd. the only way to pay for these is thru confiscatory taxation!)
What's more disturbing is the current desire in NC to eliminate future funding of infrastructure needs by hauling us back to the 17th or 18th century! The scheme to force regional rail, or even high-speed rail, upon the masses simply eliminates other useful possibilities. Take the friction-free tunnel idea. If the state or region wastes money on regional rail, an outdated useless technology, where will the funds come from for future technologies such as the tunnel? When regional rail or high-speed rail is forced upon the unsuspecting and under-educated, the option of future transportation types will be all but eliminated, cuz funds ARE limited. Even if socialists get their wishes and confiscate all but the barest minimum of our incomes for us to survive on, they still won't be able to afford future transportation if they implement yesterday's technology.
Which gov't leader is even thinking about ride-sharing options? Which gov't leader is willing to consider buses instead of trains? It's not a 'both would be good' option. It's that trains are stupidly outrageously unsustainably expensive. If gov't paid for or subsidized things like ride-sharing, it would be more efficient and less expensive than any train scheme. And if they implemented buses where the routes can be changed to accommodate rider, instead of stationary stupid trains, options would be greatly expanded.
What we need to convince gov't leaders of, especially the socialist/democrat ones, is that my back pocket has a limit. There's only so much money in my back pocket, and if you take it all there ain't any left and you are stuck taking care of me. Which, if my money is wasted on your stupid train, you won't have enough left over to also take care of me. So, you will have to let some people die in order to support the stupid train.
(i wonder if this will be posted since i've call the idea of trains 'stupid'. couldn't help being accurate in the description. it's a risk i'm willing to take.)