Why does North Carolina unemployment remain so high?

Published February 18, 2014

by Mike Walden, NCSU professor of Economics, published in WRAL Techwire, February 17, 2014.

here’s good news and bad news about the North Carolina job market. The good news is that more jobs have been created in recent years. Since the job market began to turn around in early 2010, both monthly surveys of the labor market in the state show job and employment gains totaling near 250,000.

But the bad news is that thousands of individuals don’t have jobs and want work. At the end of 2013, there were 320,000 people in the state who were officially classified as unemployed. This means they don’t have a job but want a job, and, importantly, they have recently been actively looking for work. However, there are another estimated 65,000 North Carolinians who want to work but have stopped looking and so aren’t in the official jobless numbers. Taken together, these numbers account for 130,000 more people unemployed than before the recession.

Economists who have looked at national data have generally concluded that the job recovery of the past four years has been sub-par. The same can be said for North Carolina’s jobs picture. Using employment at businesses as the measure, in the first four years after the recession of the early 1990s, job growth was 12 percent. In the first four years after the recession of the early 2000s, job growth in our state was 10 percent. This time, the job growth rate has been near 7 percent.

So why has our job recovery been relatively anemic? There are several potential reasons. One reason, in a way, is good: In North Carolina, our labor force has become more efficient. Using improved training and modern equipment and technology, production per worker increased 7 percent between 2007 and 2012 in our state, and it jumped 34 percent from 1997 to 2012. Both of these improvements in productivity exceeded the comparable national gains. The bottom line is we simply need fewer people today to produce what we make and sell.

Another issue is the construction market. Construction jobs in North Carolina plunged by one-third – the equivalent of 90,000 jobs – during the pullback in the housing market during the recession. Adding supplier and support jobs for construction doubles the total to 180,000.

Despite the improvement in home sales and home building, these jobs have not yet come back. Indeed, construction employment has still declined in our state over the past two years. While we wouldn’t necessarily expect all construction and related jobs to return to levels of the housing boom, a return to pre-boom levels is reasonable. This translates to about 45,000 construction jobs and another 45,000 related jobs – jobs that we currently don’t have.

Economists are now thinking that a major reason for slow job growth is a skills mismatch. That is, many workers are unemployed because they don’t have the skills and training employers want. There is some thinking that with the development of information technology and digital applications, the skills mismatch may have expanded in recent years.

A recent study estimated that up to a third of the increase in unemployment during the recession could have been due to this skills mismatch. For North Carolina, this would translate to about 100,000 individuals not being employed because they aren’t trained in needed skills areas. Also, the study found that the skills mismatch is not limited to high-school dropouts and high-school graduates, but is also a factor for college graduates.

Every state economy is impacted by national trends and national policies. Two large and far-reaching federal programs were passed in the last four years that some say could be having an adverse effect on job creation.

The first is the Dodd-Frank Financial Regulation Act, legislation implemented in reaction to the national financial crash in 2008. It imposes new rules, regulations and restrictions on financial services firms with a goal of preventing the kind of “speculation bubble” that occurred prior to the crash. While well-intentioned, there is some evidence that the law may be inhibiting lending, particularly to small businesses that are big job creators. In fact, small business loans have actually fallen during the recent economic recovery.

The second new law possibly having an impact on jobs is the Affordable Care Act. This is also a massive program that imposes a system of subsidies and taxes to expand the use of health insurance. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office just issued a study suggesting the incentives resulting from the ACA may contribute to slower job growth.

So where does this leave us in North Carolina? First, I’m optimistic about the construction market. As long as the residential and commercial building markets continue to improve, I think we will eventually see construction and related jobs come back. However, the skills mismatch will take a concerted effort by educators, businesses and workers to address and overcome. Related to this will be the continuing development of new technology and machinery in the workplace, which some think is resulting in fewer, not more, jobs.

So I guess it’s easy for a person to be either an optimist or pessimist about jobs. You decide which you are!

Editor's note: Dr. Mike Walden is a William Neal Reynolds Distinguished Professor and North Carolina Cooperative Extension economist in the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics of North Carolina State University’s College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. He teaches and writes on personal finance, economic outlook and public policy.

February 18, 2014 at 9:08 am
TP Wohlford says:

1. I note that he didn't cite "high tech jobs" here in RTP. That's usually the go-to position on how we're gonna get jobs -- insist that they will come from companies like Lenovo, IBM, Cisco, etc. I congratulate him. In fact, as he probably knows full well, most of the big IT players are either downsizing -- IBM has a big RIF happening this week -- or holding steady with a hiring freeze. AT some point this will impact NC, especially since the wages tend to be high and the individuals bring lots of talent to the community that is used in leadership positions.

DISCLAIMER -- I lost my State of NC IT job when that big CGI project at the Dept of Revenue crashed last summer. Prior to the ACA-inspired government shutdown, I as getting 2-3 calls PER DAY from recruiters; after that it was 2-3 PER MONTH. Things still haven't returned to normal -- I have a short term gig starting in March, but no solid permanent job yet. So obviously I think that IT hiring is, at best, muted.

2. It is well documented that the number of "traditionally male" jobs has yet to recover from the 2008 crash. He mentioned construction jobs, and I'm wondering what other "male" jobs are likewise still depressed here in NC? And for that matter, what is the solution for long-term male employment if he's not exactly college material?

3. It's time that we mention that the market for liberal arts/communications/basketweaving/etc college grads seems to be saturated. Certainly there are enough examples of college grads working in jobs where a college degree, or at least things learned in college, were not required in the job.

While it is true that college grads do better in the job market, I have to wonder what part of that is their education, and what is natural talent and motivation. We hardly have a "control group" in that old meme that says, "College grads make more money", since we insist that everyone in the top half (both in terms of talent and motivation) of the high school class goes to college. I maintain that, given the level of motivation and talent, my freshman class at my college could've showed up for Freshman Friday, dropped out the following Monday w/o attending a single class, and done fairly well in the work place.

February 18, 2014 at 11:12 am
Richard Bunce says:

Pretty good report on the jobs situation. I would add besides difficulty getting a loan just the huge barrier to entry for new business in terms of taxes/fees and regulations at the Federal, State, and increasingly Local government levels. A clarification on the recent CBO study on employee hours and the ACA. That was a reduction in employee hours as the employees choice for those only working more to get employer coverage or pay a full HCI premium. CBO has since the ACA passed also released some estimates of reductions on employee hours and jobs as the employers choice I believe.

I would take your increased productivity discussion a step further. The increase is often largely due to capital investments by the business owners and so when the discussion of who should receive any gain in profit from the increased productivity in these cases it is the provider of the capital and not the employees who often have a less demanding task to perform.