US is moving to the left
Published January 19, 2014
by Steve Rosenthal, Democratic strategist and president of The Atlas Project, published in The Washington Post, January 19, 2014.
Not too long ago, everyone was declaring American politics a lost cause for progressives. The religious right supposedly had a stranglehold on elections. Then it was the tea party that had the political establishment – initially Democrats and Republicans – quaking. The media and the general public took hold of a narrative parroted by conservative candidates and opinion leaders: The United States was a “center-right” nation.
But after two consecutive elections in which the Democratic candidate for president garnered more than 50 percent of the vote – a one-two punch last achieved by Franklin Roosevelt – it is worth questioning that assumption. The country is getting more diverse, and as the proportion of white voters shrinks, so, too, does the conservative base. As demographics shift, so do political preferences – in this case, toward the left.
It’s been well publicized how America has “evolved” on marriage equality. Washington Post-ABC News polling last year found that, by a margin of 58 percent to 36 percent, people believe their fellow Americans should be able to marry whomever they choose – something that would have been unthinkable less than a decade ago.
Over the past 10 or so years, polls have shown that the general public is also becoming more liberal on:
• Immigration. The last time the nation considered immigration reform, in 2006, 52 percent of respondents told Gallup that the priority should be halting the flow of illegal immigration. Just 43 percent preferred to deal with the undocumented immigrants already here. When Gallup asked the same question in July, the numbers had flipped: 55 percent thought the focus should be on immigrants already here, while 41 percent said the priority should be strengthening U.S. borders.
• Marijuana. In 2000, just 31 percent of Americans believed marijuana should be legalized, Gallup found, and 64 percent were opposed. The pro-legalization number has since tracked steadily upward. In October Gallup polling, 58 percent of respondents favored legalization and just 39 percent were opposed.
• Big business. Americans have grown more mistrustful of big business since 2002, when 50 percent of respondents told Gallup they were “very or somewhat satisfied” with the influence of major corporations. This number bottomed out at 29 percent in 2011 and 30 percent in 2012.
Attitudes are shifting in the states as well. In recent elections, states that were once reliably Republican red in presidential elections – including Colorado, North Carolina and Nevada – have become competitive or even solidly Democratic blue.
In the November election in Virginia, issues well to the left of the “Old Virginia” (read: conservative) mainstream not only failed to hurt Democrats but might even have helped them. Gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat, was vocal about his support for expanding Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, while Republican Ken Cuccinelli harped on Obamacare to curry favor with voters unhappy with the law. In the end, of course, McAuliffe won, and there was little evidence that health care hurt him or helped Cuccinelli’s final numbers.
It is more than an interesting observation that the United States now leans left. This should be a guiding light for politicians. With the knowledge that most Americans are, in fact, behind them, Democrats no longer need to fear running on their beliefs. They should stop letting special interests on the right hold ideas and ideals hostage and start listening to voters.
And what are the American people saying? That they’re fed up with political obstructionism and conservative policies that have left the country at a standstill. They want a new direction.
Progressives have an opportunity not only to come into the mainstream but also to lead – and shape – public opinion. President Barack Obama began to do just that last month with a speech decrying income inequality. To feed the vacuum of economic discontent, Democrats ought to argue for populist solutions such as raising the minimum wage, raising taxes on millionaires and corporations, rebuilding infrastructure, investing in education and instituting paid sick leave. Americans crave solutions, and they are moving to the left to find them. Smart politicians ought to get ahead of them.
The writer, a longtime Democratic strategist and former political director of the AFL-CIO, is founder and president of the Atlas Project, which provides progressives with research and data.
January 19, 2014 at 11:35 am
Norm Kelly says:
Steve isn't just a Democrat strategist. He's a typical lib.
He writes 'the American people ... want a new direction'.
Then what does he end his piece with? The same OLD, tired, never-ending list of lib plans. Raise taxes on the wealthy. Provide more 'benefits' to the 'needy'. Provide 'income equality' through the force of government if necessary. Actually, the 'if necessary' isn't the proper wording. The proper wording is 'income equality through government force, including income caps, legal action, jail time, and as a final step government take-over of the offending business'.
This is the new direction that Steve plans? What's new or different or workable about Steve's socialist utopian plan? What's new or different or workable about ANY Demoncrat plan or idea? Nothing. Every one of the libs ideas has been tried before. Every one of the libs ideas has failed before. Every one of the libs ideas can be shown to be 100% wrong for the majority of people and for the nation as a whole.
Try to prove me wrong, please. Show the rest of us, with the ability to read, and think enough to draw proper conclusions. Where in the world can you demonstrate that your glorified socialist plans have been implemented and shown to be better for the nation and for the majority of citizens? Show us France, where the work week has been drastically reduced by government intervention to force more people to be employed. Show us other European nations where they have made it illegal for a failing business to close. This in an effort to prevent unemployment from rising. Show us where government rules have allowed certain occupations to be considered 'hazardous', allowing those doing these jobs to retire early with full benefits. 'Hazardous' jobs like hair-dresser. Where a hair-dresser could retire at 45 (or so) with full benefits. How are these socialist plans working out for those nations? What about the socialist nations where unemployment benefits have virtually no end date? What part of their unemployment benefits plan should be imported here because it works so darn well?
What about these socialist nations, years ahead of where the libs in our country are in their planning, makes anyone want to head in this direction? What part of socialized medicine makes anyone think that it's a good idea that should be imported here? I know, BHO believes it will work. But that's probably because he spent his formative years higher than a kite. (that's not an unfounded slam against his high holiness. that's an admission of his about how he spent his youth. don't slam me as a racist because i know the facts and you don't!) Does he still partake? If so, it explains why he thinks socialism could work here when it has so monumentally failed every where else.
If Steve showed us, explained to us, a 'new idea' or 'new direction' that the left wants to take the country, something that can be shown to have worked elsewhere in the world, then perhaps he would have a leg to stand on with his argument. But he shows us nothing new. He shows us no proof that his ideas have the slightest possibility of working. Steve, or any other lib, actually should be presenting a new idea, a new direction forward for the DemocRAT party but they continue to fail to do so. Not just Steve, but every other lib that clearly states their plans. Which is very few of them. K has mentioned one of her ideas, but even that is not a new one. K has stated her support for eliminating Obamacare, in favor of a 'single payer plan'. Which is lib-speak, disguised-speak for socialized medicine. A disguised way of saying a complete take-over of the medical industry in our country. What part of K's plan is a new idea? What part of K's plan is a new direction for the Demons? What part of K's plan can be demonstrated to be successful?
Come on libs. Come up with SOMETHING new. Come up with SOMETHING provably successful that we should try here. SOMETHING. ANYTHING. ANYONE? The silence is deafening.
January 19, 2014 at 12:22 pm
Thayer Jordan says:
If this country is leaning to the left, how come we have so many Republicans messing it up?
January 19, 2014 at 3:13 pm
Tom Hauck says:
How many voters think that President Obama would have won reelection if he had told the truth about "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" and "If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan" and "The PP ACA (Patient Protection - Affordable Care Act) aka Obamacare will save every family $2,500 per year"?