UNC salaries dwarf those in other agencies
Published October 6, 2015
by Jesse Saffron and Jenna Ashley Robinson, John W. Pope Center for Higher Education, Carolina Journal, October 6, 2015.
The average annual income in North Carolina is just over $40,000. But in September, senior-level bureaucrats in the University of North Carolina system’s General Administration — who take home six-figure salaries — said they needed raises, and they got them. The system’s Board of Governors voted in favor of a salary range increase that will “assure that [UNC] has the ability to match and, when necessary, lead market in compensating hard to recruit or retain executive talent.”
The increases are “designed to [promote] good stewardship of State and University budgetary resources,” according to a statement by the board. Top-level employees in General Administration and across the state’s 16 public universities are among the highest-paid public employees in the state.
For instance, UNC system president Thomas Ross, who heads General Administration, earns $550,000 per year, $30,000 more than the chancellors at UNC-Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University (other chancellors in the system earn between $240,000 and $325,000). General Administration employs 68 people who earn more than $100,000 per year, and eight who earn more than $200,000.
But that’s just for starters. The system’s 16 universities employ 47,894 people. Of those employees, 1,039, or 2.17 percent, earn more than $200,000 and 6,243, or 13 percent, earn more than $100,000. The share of UNC employees earning six-figure salaries far outpaces that of other state agencies. Of the 87,364 state employees (from the departments of commerce, transportation, health and human services, and so forth), only 56, or 0.06 percent, earn more than $200,000, and just 1,900, or 2.17 percent, earn more than $100,000.
Examples abound. For instance, UNC-Chapel Hill’s Chief Diversity Officer, Taffye Benson Clayton, earns $195,000 per year, or 38 percent more than Gov. Pat McCrory. Clayton heads the university’s Office of Diversity and Multicultural Affairs, which hosts campus events, diversity training sessions for students and faculty, and seminars. The office employs 10 full-time employees as well as graduate and undergraduate staff members. Its second- and third-highest paid staffers earn $101,000 and $72,000, respectively.
Similarly, N.C. State’s Office for Institutional Equity and Diversity employs 30 people and has total salary expenditures that exceed $1.85 million annually. Three employees earn more than $100,000 and only two staffers earn less than $40,000. The office includes, among others, a gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender center, a Women’s Center, and an African-American cultural center.
Like UNC-Chapel Hill’s diversity and multicultural affairs office, N.C. State’s OIED has a strong “social justice” emphasis. It hosts events and offers students and faculty seminars, workshops, and conferences. In October, for example, the GLBT Center is hosting a workshop titled “Recognizing and Responding to Microaggressions.”
Progressive projects, are not the only areas that offer large salaries to administrators. For instance, East Carolina University’s department of student involvement and leadership, just one branch of the university’s student affairs division (that division’s vice chancellor makes $203,000), employs roughly 30 administrators and has total annual salary expenditures of about $1.6 million. Additionally, the director of UNC-Greensboro’s art museum makes $124,395 each year, and the bookstore manager at Appalachian State University earns $140,448 annually.
There also are at least two policy think tanks within the UNC system with million-dollar salary budgets; the public spends roughly $2.6 million each year to employ 37 people at UNC-Charlotte’s Urban Institute and N.C. State University’s Institute for Emerging Issues. The latter’s director makes $185,289 per year.
Along with administrators who are paid large salaries, the university system hires a lot of administrators. Across the system, universities employ dozens of support specialists, technicians, associates, and executive assistants.
Whenever state leaders float the idea of tightening the system’s budget, university officials claim that students will suffer. During the Great Recession, the UNC system had to manage a $400 million cut. More than 500 vacant faculty positions were eliminated (vacant positions are part of “management flexibility” appropriations), as well as some administrative positions, but degree programs weren’t affected. Today, state appropriations account for roughly 43 percent of the UNC system’s revenue (nationally, that figure averages about 28 percent). As a result, average in-state tuition is lower than that of all neighboring states.
The system is a $9.5 billion public enterprise. The latest UNC salary and administrator data suggest that there are areas to cut costs and improve efficiency.
Jesse Saffron is a senior writer for the John W. Pope Center for Higher Education Policy and Jenna Ashley Robinson is the center’s president.
http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=12447
October 6, 2015 at 9:44 am
Norm Kelly says:
Comparing public sector salaries to private sector salaries is disingenuous, to say the least. Everyone knows that talented individuals in the private sector are a dime a dozen, which drives down salaries/wages. On the other hand, public sector talent is a rare commodity, and therefore warrants a bigger salary.
To say that the average citizens' salary is only $40K per year compared to the outrageous salaries paid to education bureaucrats making in excess of $100K has any bearing is illogical. There are so many reasons that public sector employees deserve higher salaries than those who pay taxes to support those salaries. Everyone knows job security in the public sector is much less secure than in the private sector. The stress of public sector jobs dwarfs the stress of private sector jobs. Benefits are less in the public sector than the private sector, so the difference is made up for by larger public sector salaries. Private sector employees aren't required to belong to and pay dues to unions. Government employees must be compensated for the requirement to belong to the union and pay dues to the demon party. I mean, union bosses. (it's so hard to keep the 2 separated!)
Besides, we are told so often that the state budget has been cut to the bone, there's no place left to cut, the only option is to raise taxes, that the argument of overpaid public sector employees falls on deaf ears. Most socialists agree that both spending and taxes need to increase. Remember the demons tell us the state can't afford to cut either taxes or spending. It's absolutely necessary for citizens to suffer from higher taxes than for the state to not be able to pay for whatever they desire to pay for. Gas taxes can't be lowered because the state can't afford it. Sales taxes can't be cut because the state can't afford it. Salaries of 'executives' in the public sector can't be frozen or reduced; it is the responsibility of government to make sure private sector executives don't make 'too much' though!
So, in order to help justify overpaying public sector employees, the lib response is to force private sector employers to pay higher wages. Not because the company can afford it. Not because the employee necessarily deserves it. But because the government has to be able to hide the disparity between public sector and private sector salaries. Hence the push for $15 minimum wage. Plus an automatic increase in minimum wage (libs hope) will drive an increase in government take due to income taxes and sales taxes. Except when companies can't afford the artificial wage, they tend to reduce staff, do more automation, and therefore cut employee expenses, reducing the take to government.
Everything lib requires checking your brain at the door. Thinking not allowed in order to be a lib. The appearance of impropriety is cause for indicting a Republican, but out-and-out law-breaking must be excused if the perp is a demon/lib. Witness both Bill and Hillary, just for starters.
October 6, 2015 at 10:21 am
bruce stanley says:
Thank you Carolina Journal for shining light on this. Maybe the legislature could get the left wing media off their back by transferring some of that dough to K-12 teachers.