Top-Down Reforms Leave Teachers Feeling Powerless

Published September 3, 2013

imagesby Kristen Blair, John Locke Foundation, September 3, 2013.

In the classroom, nothing beats a good teacher. Abundant research affirms teacher quality as the most significant in-school predictor of student achievement. Teachers know they have the power to leave a profound imprint on the minds of students; for many, this core belief shapes their choice of teaching as an occupation.

Yet scores of teachers are withdrawing emotionally from their work. Two recent surveys paint a portrait of alarmingly low levels of engagement and satisfaction among K-12 teachers nationwide. Such findings call for corrective action — empowering teachers, principals, and other decision makers closest to students.

According to a Gallup poll released Aug. 1, fewer than one in three teachers (31 percent) is fully engaged, defined as being “deeply involved in and enthusiastic about their work, and actively contributing” to their school.

Other recent data chronicle a seismic shift in satisfaction: The latest MetLife Survey of the American Teacher found job satisfaction is now at a 25-year low — plummeting 23 points in five years, with a five-point drop in the past year alone. Only 39 percent of teachers are “very satisfied” with their jobs.

Why this satisfaction slide? Assuredly, teachers face myriad challenges — shifting budgets, excessive testing, complicated student needs, unreasonable parents — all of which can sap enthusiasm. But something else is afoot: Teachers today feel unbelievably stretched and marginalized. More than half in MetLife’s survey experience “great stress several days a week.” And they have a diminished sense of personal efficacy: “Teachers are the least likely of all occupations to say ‘at work my opinions seem to count,’” according to Gallup.

Is the answer better leadership from principals? Gallup senior scientist Shane Lopez says so, highlighting ample work force data reinforcing the importance of good managers. Certainly, capable, responsive school leaders are essential — but they’re only part of the solution.

Principals themselves acknowledge that K-12 education has changed considerably: Three out of four told MetLife their jobs had become “too complex.” Though highly accountable, principals have substantially less decision-making power in certain key areas than they did a decade ago: Only four in 10 say they have “a great deal of control over curriculum and instruction.”

Low control coupled with high expectations is a deadly duo, creating toxic work force stress. Anyone familiar with research on occupational strain knows this to be true. Yet what priorities does current K-12 education policy reflect?

Instead of maximizing local control, we have doubled down on federal mandates and directives. As U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., (U.S. secretary of education 20 years ago) wrote recently in National Review, “Over the last decade, the U.S. Department of Education has become so congested with federal mandates that it has become, in effect, a national school board.”

Indeed, the No Child Left Behind law intensified a top-down approach to reform that shows no signs of abating. Federal mandates have been followed by waivers that freed states from NCLB burdens only to stipulate new requirements, including the adoption of “common” standards or those certified by state higher education institutions.

Not surprisingly, most states, including North Carolina, have chosen the Education Department-supported Common Core — an unprecedented educational shift that will drive curriculum and diminish educators’ already-eroding autonomy in the classroom.

When will our love affair with top-down reform end? The writing is on the wall: Increasingly, classrooms are becoming regimented boiler rooms governed by disembodied bureaucrats. Of course we need accountability and high standards, but states, and ultimately, local school boards and communities should be the drivers of educational change. Otherwise, the next slide for fed-up teachers just may be the one out the door.

Kristen Blair is a North Carolina Education Alliance fellow.

September 3, 2013 at 8:57 am
Richard Bunce says:

Teachers have had decades to push for real reform but instead marched in lock step with the government education industrial complex, killing any real reform that would improve the education of all students and give the students parents a full range of education system choices that would have resulted in improved education for their children. It is a systemic issue that government bureaucracies are doomed to fail and government school systems are a perfect example of that axiom.

September 3, 2013 at 10:28 am
dj anderson says:

"classrooms are becoming regimented boiler rooms governed by disembodied bureaucrats" - story quote that shows the emotional perspective of the story

Nothing to do with the content of this story, but I'll state a premise to work from: Top down reforms allows for uniformity across a system, state, and nation. Bottom up might work for one school house of teachers, working with parents to teach students more effectively and efficiency, but can only act as a model for teaching as a whole.

In math, surely it is possible to have common goals and measures to see how well students comprehend concepts, master needed skills, and apply them in problem solving. In elementary school it seems anything except complex to have common goals. How many different ways are we going to teach perimeter, area, volume? Don't we share vocabulary about geometric shapes? There can be common goals and measures. I can see arguing more over how to test than how to teach.

There once was a time in the 1970s when schools were oh so wonderful with "A" for-effort-teaching and many warm fuzzy feelings from self-pronounced "how-great-we-are" but then, someone started comparing those "individual" success stories with the nation as a whole and other countries and found them lacking.

We can stop the pressure to produce measurable learning and go to non-graded schools without testing in one day, declare our schools the best and make sure everyone is laughing and smiling all the time, if we want. Do we?

Do we really want every teacher to use their own methodology, every principal to select curricula, and expect parents who take the school's "word" that their children have learned by the marks on a report card?

This article is a slanted pitch against a uniform effort, but doesn't give us an workable alternative.

September 3, 2013 at 12:28 pm
Richard Bunce says:

We should assess every government program/service on a regular basis to assure taxpayers they are getting value for their tax dollars. The problem with the assessment of government is that the government left it up to the folks being assessed, the government school bureaucrats, administrators, and teachers, and they turned it into a flawed test of the students. The assessment should be done by an independent organization without any participation by anyone involved with the government school systems. Then we might find out what is going on that is making so many taxpayers and parents with children in these government schools systems question their value.

September 3, 2013 at 7:21 pm
Bill Worley says:

Richard Bunce, you are nothing more than a troll who writes the same drivel over nd over again on article after article. I wish there was a way to ignore people like you.

I don't think the author did a very good job when she spoke about curriculum development at the local level. I'm fairly certain that the point of the article is more that reform always seems to come from people who know nothing about education, rather than from the people who actually teach. A common set of standards is highly desirable (and for what it's worth, the recent teeth gnashing over the common core standards is just so much silliness). We've always had such a thing.

The federal government offers financial support in some areas of education and, as a result, seems to be sticking much more thn it's nose into an area that is the responsibility of the states. But even on a state level we see a similar pattern of legislators will little to no education knowledge (other than having gone to school) determining policy, as though their experience as farmers, lawyers, or businessmen omehow make them experts on child psychology and pedagogy.

September 4, 2013 at 10:30 am
Richard Bunce says:

Yes and all the government education industrial complex based training results in government schools where half the students do not read at grade level. We definitely need some new thinking in education... or at least parents free to find their child the best education that they can. GEIC thinks anything other than their way is drivel.

September 4, 2013 at 10:40 pm
dj anderson says:

Bill, thanks for your thoughts on spin. So many read and so few comment, that those few are precious. Why discourage lurkers from making comments? Thought you were being over reactive toward Richard, who is one of the few who comment consistently. Everyone can express any opinion on here, to a point, but Spin has big boss Tom who will, and has, asked problem posters (including trolls) off the list. I'm wanting those of us trying to contribute comments to disagree if we want, but to do it agreeably. I'd like to see a lot more people hitting the LIKE buttons and making comments.

September 5, 2013 at 11:05 am
Richard Bunce says:

Some people cannot handle the truth...