The new culture of corruption in Raleigh

Published November 15, 2014

By Chris Fitzsimon

by Chris Fitzsimon, NC Policy Watch and NC SPIN panelist, November 14, 2014.

Governor Pat McCrory’s new private nonprofit shadow Commerce Department announced its full roster of board members this week and the news was dutifully reported by the media across the state—but most stories left something important out.

The nonprofit, called the Economic Development Partnership of North Carolina, was created as a way to make the state’s efforts to recruit industry more nimble and responsive, though it’s never been entirely clear how it will work in practice or why it is needed.

The explanations in the press releases are generally an amalgam of buzzwords — “customer service,” “innovation,” “robust analysis,” etc.  — things that the Commerce Department itself has always claimed to provide.

Then there is the group’s leadership and CEO Richard Lindenmuth, who as Sarah Ovaska with NC Policy Watch has reported, has a checkered past and was accused of overcharging for his work managing corporate bankruptcies.

One board member said the new board would be the single point of contact for corporations looking to come to North Carolina. But isn’t that what the Commerce Secretary and her top staff do?

Now we have a private and less accountable entity playing a role interacting with corporations, many of whom will receive financial incentives to move to North Carolina or expand if they are already here.

That makes being on the board an influential job, working with corporate leaders behind the scenes. One of the board members is Bob Singer, an attorney with the Brooks Pierce law firm in Greensboro.

The firm had lobbyists patrolling the legislative halls last session on behalf of more than a dozen corporate clients, including United Health Care, Cisco, and the N.C. Petroleum and Convenience Marketers.

And more importantly Singer is apparently still the president of the Renew North Carolina Foundation, a political organization with close ties to Gov. McCrory that raises large anonymous contributions from corporations. The Foundation ran television ads at the end of the 2013 defending McCrory’s performance in his first year in office.

The Foundation also held a private two-day retreat with McCrory and his staff during the crucial last days of the 2013 budget debate, where donors could spend time with the governor for $5,000. If they came up with $25,000 or $50,000 they could sign-up as year-long members of the Foundation and get invited to other events with private access to McCrory and his top lieutenants.

Singer’s involvement with the political group wasn’t mentioned in many of the media reports about the new board members for the private economic development nonprofit.

But it’s awfully convenient. Singer can use his quasi-official role with the economic development board to help corporate executives get what they need to come to North Carolina and while he’s at it, maybe collect a large contribution for the Governor’s shadowy political group. Nothing like secretly buying some goodwill with the governor’s team.

It’s not the first time that the Renew North Carolina Foundation and this new private economic development nonprofit have intersected.

The driving force behind the nonprofit is John Lassiter, a Charlotte businessman and close confidant of McCrory.

Lassiter has been involved with the privatization effort from the beginning and also was appointed by McCrory to chair the N.C. Economic Development Board. He is now the chair of the new Economic Development Partnership.

Lassiter was also one of the founding members of the Renew North Carolina Foundation and served as its chair, presumably raising anonymous money from corporations for the political group too, until his dual role and obvious conflict of interest came to light and he resigned from the Foundation—not that anyone believes he’s completely out of the business of raising money for McCrory in some capacity.

Now it’s Singer’s turn. The Secretary of State’s office still lists him as the head of the foundation and he simply should not be allowed to serve on the economic development board while raising anonymous money from corporations for a political group at the same time.

McCrory could handle this another way of course, by making the contributions to the Renew North Carolina Foundation public, so everything is above board and we’ll know who is buying access and influence and who is receiving business incentives.

McCrory has promised the most transparent administration in North Carolina history after all. Let’s see if he means it.

http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2014/11/14/the-follies-of-the-new-culture-of-corruption-in-raleigh-2/

November 15, 2014 at 10:29 am
Norm Kelly says:

Once again, the title of this post almost certainly gives away the author. While it may have been 'hard' to guess the exact author, knowing that it was a die-hard lib was too easy! When the demon party controlled Raleigh, and all kinds of scams were happening, demon pols going on trial for violating the law, demon pols going to jail for violating the law, libs everywhere attempted to divert our attention away from the scandals & schemes of those libs. Now that Republicans/conservatives control Raleigh, the 'corruption' stories abound. We can expect the same to happen when stories are written about Washington just after the first of the year. Socialists LIE to the American people, socialists refer to voters as STUPID, socialists purposely use 'tortured' language to implement their schemes, force their schemes upon us, yet it's always a 'culture of corruption' in the Republican party! Recent example of demon outrage: XL pipeline postponed for political reasons, until Mary needs some votes, then XL becomes an important aspect of America's future. Bad policy yesterday, important for jobs & energy independence today. Libs/socialists/demon pols are a funny lot. Not funny ha-ha, but funny scary, funny outrageous, funny in that what happens amongst themselves is projected onto their opponents.

'things that the Commerce Department itself has always claimed to provide'. Except, as a fully government institution, NONE of the adjectives used as 'buzz words' correctly define the Commerce Department. There's one thing for sure, government agencies are completely inefficient. Government agencies are stacked with political appointees, not qualified people. (yeah, sometimes they are also qualified, but too often they are simply there as a reward from some politician!) Most government agencies are stacked with people who's heads and attitudes are much much much bigger than their position. Too many government agents exercise authority much beyond their job requirements. Want proof? Deal with the DMV officer. Deal with an inspections officer. How many times have you run across an inspector on the job that decides some particular thing MUST be enforced but can't produce the documentation in THE CODE showing the authority of said inspector. If you haven't experienced this, you haven't dealt with inspectors too often. Want another example? Check out the coal ash ponds that have existed, according to the N&D, FOR DECADES! Who is responsible for overseeing these ponds? Which department of government employees was responsible for protecting the citizens from hazardous materials leaking into our streams, rivers, ponds, lakes, and DRINKING WATER? DENR! Which government agency KNEW these ponds existed and WERE LEAKING? That's right! DENR! So, libs, Chris, socialists, N&D editorial board, how about you explain to thinking people how 'efficient' government agencies are?! How about you show us how government agencies are doing their jobs to PROTECT citizens the way the law says they are supposed to? Where is the customer service in some of these demonstrated cases? In some cases, it really can be more than buzz words that describe government agencies and employees. It's just hard to find examples.

I guarantee the rest of this post is not worth wasting time to read. Not just because it came from Chris, but that is one reason. When socialists contribute to demon pols, it's not a problem nor worth mentioning. You heard an awful lot of awful words thrown at the Koch brothers in the recent election cycle. Not once did you hear anything about the millions donated by Soros or the unions. Because Soros and unions contribute 'clean' money that does NOT influence demon pols. It's money from the Koch's that is dirty and should be banned; it's 'dirty' money. Too much of the rest of this post tries to show negative reasons why 'private' is worse, more dangerous than 'public', yet the 'public' failures are supposed to be ignore. It's only 'private' failures that are to be noticed and exploited. Typical lib. Typical lib response.

November 15, 2014 at 11:18 am
Richard Bunce says:

Easy way to fix this... get the State out of the business incentives business. Not like the government bureaucrats were any better than the private sector bureaucrats and probably worse.