The annual ritual of cynically suspending the blame

Published November 26, 2014

By Chris Fitzsimon

by Chris Fitzsimon, NC Policy Watch and NC SPIN panelist, November 25, 2014.

The holiday season is upon us and that means another annual event is here again too, the once-a-year appeal by political leaders to help the same low-income people their policies ignore or punish the rest of the year.

You’ve probably seen the request from a politician, asking you to donate generously to your local rescue mission, food pantry, emergency shelter or medical clinic. And you should. They do incredible work to help children and families who are struggling to survive.

But there’s a disconnect somehow in the holiday message and the rhetoric we hear from many political leaders and right-wing pundits the rest of the time. Low-income families and unemployed workers don’t fare so well in their press releases and talking points then.

Instead they are portrayed as lazy, people who are living off the government, who aren’t looking hard enough to find a job.

They are “takers” we are told, the 47 percent that Mitt Romney so famously derided in the 2012 presidential campaign.

They need to help themselves, pull themselves up by their bootstraps. Those are the clichйs and the stereotypes we hear about the poor and the unemployed in Raleigh and Washington, that helping people who are struggling only breeds dependence and makes them less likely to do what they need to do to lift themselves out of poverty.

And it goes beyond legitimate questions about the effectiveness of specific anti-poverty programs. It’s somehow become acceptable in the current political debate to blame people for their struggles, to question their character.

Then Thanksgiving rolls around and we’re told that the same people deserve our help and support. Maybe it’s holiday guilt. More likely it is cynical politics that creates this month of compassionate talk from late November until the end of the year.

But people are hungry all year long. One in five households in North Carolina has trouble affording enough food to eat sometime during the year. That is the fifth highest food insecurity rate in the country.

One in four children in North Carolina lives in poverty. There are 358,000 families living below the poverty line and in half of them at least one adult has a full-time job and still can’t make ends meet.

When you take into account the laid off workers who have dropped out of the labor force because there are no jobs to find, the state unemployment rate is over 12 percent.

Thousands of our neighbors need our help and support this holiday season and they need help when the holidays are over too. They need a hot meal tonight and they need hope for tomorrow.

They need policies that help them, not politicians who blame them. Restoring the state Earned Income Tax Credit that directly helps low-wage workers would be a good place to start. So would raising the minimum wage, a proposal supported by majority of North Carolinians and recently approved by voters in conservative states like Arkansas, Alaska, and South Dakota.

Expanding Medicaid would help tremendously too, providing health care for 500,000 low-income adults who are now gambling that they won’t get sick and forgoing basic preventive care that could keep them healthy.

And for all the talk of the reduction in the state unemployment debt to the federal government, it’s time to revisit the cuts to benefits that have left the families of laid off workers without any support.

Remember all that the next time you see a politician at a soup kitchen during the holidays asking for your support.

And give generously this holiday season if you can.

And then demand that the politicians who seem so compassionate this time of the year remember low-income families when the holidays are over and stop blaming them for their plight and start adopting policies to help them.

 http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2014/11/25/the-annual-ritual-of-cynically-suspending-the-blame/

November 26, 2014 at 9:12 am
Richard Bunce says:

Chris has a problem distinguishing between voluntary contributions to private programs that actually help people in need versus government confiscation of peoples wealth including the people in need of help for the benefit of government bureaucrats in government programs that are particularly ineffective at helping people in need. In Chris's world the only "greater good" is accomplished by government bureaucrats who do not give a damn.

November 27, 2014 at 3:12 pm
Norm Kelly says:

Can't say it any better than Richard, so I won't try.

But, as Richard said, Chris seems to miss the point. Since he's a lib, a die-hard demon supporter, this is to be expected. The difference between a social give-away program with the goal of making a politician feel good and a private/religious organization that actually helps PEOPLE are like night and day. One works, the other makes someone rich and feeling good. Which is worth supporting? And which is worth reducing? Maybe we should ask Billary if he's still donating his used underwear?

November 26, 2014 at 10:18 am
Tom Hauck says:

Thank you for an interesting column -- A column that gives me the opportunity to ask the reason for all these poor people. I do not blame them - I blame the liberal politicians who have begun programs that destroy any possibility, or any incentive, to get a good education or to work hard to get ahead.

Your column did not have one mention about the poor getting a good education as a foundation to a better life. Nor did it mention not having babies prior to getting married as the foundation to a better life.

We keep hearing about how wonderful the Chapel Hill school system is for teaching our children. I agree for the middle class students or the NED or Not Economically Disadvantaged. 82.4% of those kids passed both their Reading and Math End Of Grade tests (in 2012 -13 school year -- the latest available). How about the poor or ED or Economically Disadvantaged passing those same tests -- sadly only 31.0% of those kids passed.

Those results condemn the poor to stay poor and the liberals (politicians, columnists, etc.) to have a nice life working to make the rest of us feel badly for not giving the poor what they want.