Tax Reform or Tax Tweaking?

Published June 6, 2013

By Tom Campbell

by Tom Campbell

Before the January start of this legislative session leaders of both houses proclaimed major overhaul of North Carolina’s tax codes to be among their highest priorities. Three weeks before the July 1 start of the new fiscal year, when tax and spending measures are to be implemented, these promised reforms haven’t materialized, begging the question whether lawmakers have the courage to make dramatic changes or will, like previous legislatures, just tweak current policies?

Few refute the need for reforming tax codes that are outdated, unwieldy, filled with loopholes, preferences and exceptions and do not reflect the 21st century economy in which we live. There is general agreement to lower personal and corporate income tax rates while broadening the base to include sales taxes on more services. There is less agreement how to accomplish these goals without either big tax increases or giant reductions in revenues coming to state government.

This week we witnessed the difficulty legislators are facing. Three reform plans are on the table, two from the Senate and one from the House. The “Rucho plan,” most identified with Mecklenburg Senator Bob Rucho, would make major and immediate changes. The House plan and another Senate plan, called the “Clodfelter-Hartsell plan,” would make less drastic and more gradual changes. Rucho contends that unless major changes are enacted they do little more than nibble around the edges and continue the practice of favoring certain groups and industries. At a recent Senate Finance Committee meeting he asked how many in the audience were lobbyists. When most raised their hands, Rucho said, “Members of the committee, I just want you to remember those are the folks that are in the process of trying to be sure this tax system stays complicated and loopholes are maintained.” He is right.

Film industry advocates want to continue the big tax breaks received when TV shows or movies are filmed in our state. Hospitals and nonprofits want to continue their exemption from paying sales taxes. Realtors and homeowners want to continue tax exemptions for mortgage interest and property taxes, and nonprofits insist that charitable contributions be allowed as deductions. These and scores of others groups are lined up outside lawmakers’ offices saying they agree with reform but their preferences must be continued. Legislators understand tax reform is not for the faint hearted.

Lawmakers cannot afford to adjourn without some tax changes but they have neither the resolve nor the votes to make sweeping overnight changes. This legislature has proved itself willing and ready to make bold and dramatic changes in many policy areas but will not be so bold in tax reform. Expect to see a package of gradual changes implemented over a period of years. Personal and corporate income taxes will see some reduction while there will be some expansion in services subject to sales taxes, but nowhere near the 130 some have suggested. Great care will be taken to ensure the tax burden on middle-income citizens doesn’t increase significantly.

Lawmakers will claim victory in tax reform, defending their actions by saying the current tax codes evolved over many years and cannot be overhauled in one year. Critics will say they failed in their promise of major change and merely tweaked current policies. Voters will deliver the final verdict in 2014.

June 6, 2013 at 3:08 pm
Edward Abby Hoffman says:

The "general agreement to lower personal and corporate income tax rates while broadening the base to include sales taxes on more services", shows how out of touch and corrupt our 'reps' are. The bought and paid for puppets of 'the 1%' plutocracy are going in exactly the wrong direction. Complicated to hide cheating or simple to stabilize theft of infrastructure, the direction is wrong. The plutocrats need to be fired before they further enslave people to kill the planet.

June 10, 2013 at 7:16 am
Stan Bozarth says:

It would be useful to see an accounting of how the proposed changes would impact people of various income levels, and to see, by line item / category of both the old and proposed tax structure, the amounts of revenue expected to be lost or generated. Surely this data is available...else, how could our legislators make any reasonable decisions? Perhaps you could post that information here...or advise that it isn't available and thereby inform us that either the legislature has no idea of what it is doing, or that they refuse to share what they know.

It's hard to imagine that increasing taxes on groceries and prescription drugs, for example, to eliminate the current income tax is a good thing for working people. So, let's see the facts and/or projections and decide how we all fare under the new plan.

June 11, 2013 at 6:37 am
John Bonaparte says:

http://iei.ncsu.edu/tools/taxcalculator/Calculator2012.swf

Stan, the link above is not entirely, but pretty accurate. The collections are from 2010-2011, but it's still fun to armchair the state budget.

June 18, 2013 at 8:06 pm
Stan Bozarth says:

I contacted my legislator's office and requested and promptly received the most current data. Essentially for the income levels shown (20, 40, 60, 80, 100 and 200K) for various types of payers (married filing joint, single, etc) the new projected tax plan would reduce taxes on everyone...with the higher incomes getting the biggest percentage reductions. Nothing on incomes above 200K and no info on corporate taxes.

I will leave it to you to surmise/suggest what the impact would be on the budget and some of the critical functions provided by/through state funding. Pick some figures...say 6% or 8% or 10% or even 15% less to spend. What gets cut?