Separate, unequal

Published May 21, 2014

Editorial by Greensboro News-Record, May 21, 2014.

 

In the fall of 1957, a nervous handful of black students crossed the color line in Greensboro schools, braving the withering heat of racist taunts and the chill of loneliness to attend previously all-white Gillespie Elementary and Grimsley High.

The 1954 Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision had allowed those six students legally to attend schools that previously had barred them because of their race. Vile words and cruel spirits were another matter.

Fourteen years later, what were then the Greensboro City Schools complied with federal pressure to desegregate through a systemwide redistricting plan. To the city’s credit, it didn’t close its predominantly black schools, as in other communities; the orange buses ran in two directions. Previously all-black schools such as Dudley High opened their doors to their first white students. Reluctantly, at first, new friendships were forged. Racial myths melted under the light of familiarity. Many of the students didn’t want the upheaval. But many also still believed that, in the long run, a greater good was being served. Forty-three years later, it’s fair to ask: Was it?

“We were leading the way,” a member of that first desegregated class told researcher Sarah Oatsvall of the University of Kansas. “Now we all look at it and say, what was the point? Why bother?”

As the News & Record’s Marquita Brown reported Sunday, in a quarter of what today are called the Guilford County Schools, 90 percent of the student populations are minorities. In fact, many classrooms are more segregated in 2014 than they were in the 1970s.

What happened? White flight to the suburbs. A mounting wave of private and charter schools. Persistent segregation in neighborhoods. Court rulings that banned race as a factor in school redistricting. And a community that gradually lost its appetite, among both black and white parents, for desegregation, given the growing cost and inconvenience.

To be sure, there is no segregation by law, but there is segregation, and its price is just as steep. Today’s segregation also includes high concentrations of poverty, which too often translates into poorer performance in the classroom. Separate and unequal.

Some remedies, such as specialized magnet schools, have helped. But shifting demographics and logistics make more racially diverse classrooms all but impossible to achieve today. The overall student population in the Guilford County Schools is only 37 percent white; 57 percent of all students qualify for free or reduced-price lunches.

Going forward, Guilford County still should take every step to ensure that every student has the opportunity to succeed, wherever he or she attends. Attracting the best teachers and strong principals to the neediest schools will help. So will more magnets. And having an honest, if difficult, conversation about the racial gap in student achievement, which crosses socioeconomic lines.

As for the broader issue, school boards can’t tell us where to live. It’s up to us as a community to decide that the only place for segregated housing should be in a history book.

 

http://www.news-record.com/opinion/n_and_r_editorials/article_c89e0254-e059-11e3-a410-001a4bcf6878.html

May 21, 2014 at 7:57 pm
Norm Kelly says:

The rise of single parent homes has a great deal to do with poor school performance. The rise of families where both parents work full time jobs has a great deal to do with poor school performance.

How can we, as a society, exacerbate the problem? What could we do, as a society not as individuals, to make the situation even worse? Bus kids around the county. That's right, the liberal solution to the problem only makes the problem worse.

Imagine, a poor black family with 3 kids - 1 or 2 parents really doesn't matter in my example, but let's assume both for now. Let's say there is a school about 5 minutes from their residence - either by vehicle or walking, it doesn't matter.

Then there's a mostly white school located a half hours drive from the residence. In order to achieve integrated schools, all 3 of those black kids get bussed over to the white school. At the same time, some white kids will be bussed about a half hours drive from their residence to the mostly black school.

The black parents from the poor area of the county are possibly going to have an extremely difficult time attending ANY school event with their kids; the black parents are going to have a hard time attending parent-teacher conferences; the black parents are going to have a hard time picking up their kid from school in the event of illness. It's possible, though not guaranteed, that the white family, whose kids have been bussed across the county, will also find it more difficult to participate in school activities with their kids.

Education IS a family affair. Allowing parents to be involved in their kids education is critical. It is even more so when there are other factors that could interfere with a good education. Things like being poor or a single parent family or living in a certain neighborhood. Any factor that can disrupt a good education shouldn't be made worse by an administration whose goal is to make sure 'the numbers' look good, from a racial mix perspective.

White flight. What causes it? Things like Wake County school administrators forcing families to send their kids across county when there's a school around the corner. Preventing kids from attending the school near home and forcing kids to go to a school that has a much lower achievement level. If a school barely scrapes by EOGs, simply importing some white kids is not going to improve the environment. If the expectation of the school administration and teachers is such that raising the test results from 50 to 60 is a good thing, the kids who had been performing well at their 'old' school won't be achieving as much. So the smart kids are brought down more than the 'poor' kids are raised up. Bad for the smart kids. Not good enough for the 'poor' kids.

Separate but unequal is not good, I agree. But forcibly removing family from the education equation doesn't help the situation. Removing family from the education equation makes the situation worse. Do I have the best answer? Nope. Don't even claim to. I know what doesn't work. And forced busing is one of those things. Those people who have the opportunity to avoid being forced out of control will find a way to regain control. And those people with the opportunity to do what's best for their kids will find a way. How do you do anything about that? Make alternative choices illegal?