Seeking middle ground
Published December 18, 2015
by Patrick Gannon, The Insider, published in The Greenville Daily Reflector, December 17, 2015.
Rarely do we hear a politician talk so candidly and publicly about the shortcomings of his political party.
State Rep. Ken Goodman, a Democrat from Rockingham, did that recently at a luncheon with political and business leaders from across the state.
Democrats, Goodman said, lost about 25 General Assembly seats in the 2010 election. The pummeling gave Republicans their first two-chamber majority in more than a century. Democratic leadership at the time thought voters just weren’t hearing them, but the opposite was true, Goodman said.
“We just weren’t hearing the voters,” he told more than 300 people at the luncheon sponsored by the pro-business group the N.C. FreeEnterprise Foundation.
In 2012, Goodman said, Democrats lost about 10 more legislative seats. You’d think that would have driven home the point that people were fed up with the status quo, he said. (He didn’t say it, but I think he meant the “tax and spend” liberal Democrats, as Republicans like to call them).
“(Voters) wanted government to work and make a difference in their everyday lives.” Goodman said.
With that in mind at the start of the 2015 legislative session, Goodman, along with state Sen. Joel Ford of Charlotte, formed the Main Street Democrats, a caucus centered around job growth and economic development, support for public education and investments in infrastructure, technology and health care. The Main Street Democrats, Goodman said, decided to “totally avoid divisive social issues” and instead work with the Republican majority to “advance good public policy.”
The caucus also agreed not to participate in “political posturing or destructive tactics,” Goodman said. In other words, they aim to be pro-business, moderate Democrats who change voters’ attitudes about what the Democratic Party had become. They hope ultimately to win back seats for Democrats.
Goodman touted the group’s accomplishments to date. The big piece of economic incentives legislation during the 2015 session – House Bill 117 – wouldn’t have passed without the caucus’s support because of opposition from the far right and far left. And about 30 House Democrats voted for the Republican-penned House version of the state budget because of the Main Street Democrats, Goodman said.
“Newspapers all over the state were writing about the emergence of a moderate voice within the Democratic caucus,” he said.
Goodman, who is running for re-election in 2016, said he understands that Republicans and Democrats have significant disagreements about policy and the role of government.
“That is healthy,” he said. “But when I talk to voters, they have no interest in hyper-partisanship and the ranting of the extreme right and the extreme left. They just want government to work.”
Just before this year’s legislative session concluded, Goodman said a senior Republican House member told him that Democrats lost touch with the people and got voted out of state government a few years ago.
“And I can see that beginning to happen on our side of the aisle,” the Republican said, according to Goodman.
And every time the Republicans in charge in Raleigh consider a far-right social issue, like waiting periods for abortions or allowing magistrates to opt out of performing gay marriages, the Main Street Democrats will be sitting there near the middle, waiting for many of their former voters to come back to them.
Sooner or later, they will.
Patrick Gannon writes about North Carolina government and politics for the Capitol Press Association.
http://www.reflector.com/opinion/other-voices/gannon-seeking-middle-ground-3092831
December 18, 2015 at 9:51 am
Norm Kelly says:
'like waiting periods for abortions'. This is common sense changes to the act of killing babies. Libs demand waiting periods for getting a gun permit. This is Constitutionally guaranteed but libs demand a waiting period. Abortion is NOT Constitutionally guaranteed, but libs demand NO WAITING period. Why are libs so hell-bent on killing babies? If I decide to refinance my mortgage, the law DEMANDS a 3 day waiting period. It does not matter how much I want to refinance immediately, I don't want to change my mind, for some reason central planner pols FORCE me to wait 3 days. On a voluntary step to refinance my mortgage. Yet, libs despise the idea of waiting ANY PERIOD OF TIME TO KILL A BABY! One decision, to refinance my mortgage, is voluntary, affects only me, and could save me money or allow me to take out some extra cash to pay off something else. This is a task I want to do, but I'm forced by pols to wait. But if I decide to kill a baby, not only do libs insist that the facility NOT be inspected or meet any standards, but libs insist that NOTHING get in the way of me getting my baby killed. That makes perfect sense. Except it makes no sense. And anyone it does make sense to should be questioned strongly on their sanity! Killing babies in a 'doctors' office, legal. Getting in an auto accident where the fetus of the pregnant woman in the other car dies automatically brings manslaughter or death by vehicle charges. See, libs ARE confused people. And they are tax and spend liberals. This is what defines the Demoncrat party. Witness Roy, Billary, Bernie, etc etc etc. Goodman is a lone voice in the woods! He's started with the right idea, but to finish his thought he needs to register as a libertarian and leave the demon party behind, just as they have left the majority of voters behind!