Renewable mandates mean NC taxpayers pay twice
Published August 26, 2015
by Francis DeLuca, Civitas Institute, published in NC Capitol Connection, August 25, 2015.
North Carolinians are forced to pay twice to prop up the state’s renewable energy lobby: once in the form of higher taxes and again for higher electric bills to support a Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (REPS).
North Carolina is the only Southeastern state with a REPS program. A REPS program forces utilities to meet mandated levels of electric generation through the use of “renewables,” such as solar and wind. Under the North Carolina REPS law, first adopted in 2007, this mandated level rises over time; it is scheduled to double to 6 percent this year and increase to 12.5 percent by 2021.
These alternative sources of fuel have two main problems: They are not available 100 percent of the time as are conventional fuel sources, and they are more expensive than traditional sources, especially when you add in the extra costs required to provide backup energy by traditional power sources when wind and solar drop off line – which they frequently do.
Because electric utilities are regulated monopolies, they simply pass these increased costs through to ratepayers.
A recent study conducted by Strata Policy in conjunction with Utah State University’s Institute of Political Economy estimated that North Carolina residential ratepayers will pay on average a total of $149 million more per year in utility bills because of the renewable portfolio.
Such increased energy bills naturally impact low-income households the hardest, as they must spend a larger share of their monthly income on utility bills than do higher middle- and upper income households.
Moreover, North Carolina is in a continuing battle with neighboring states to attract new industry. REPS is driving up the cost of electricity in North Carolina and making the Old North State uncompetitive in attracting new industry. The Strata study further concluded that higher energy bills on commercial and industrial ratepayers has discouraged investment and job creation, already costing the state 24,000 jobs and $14.4 billion in personal income.
The appearance of bigger utility bills is not the only cost imposed by North Carolina’s “renewable energy” lobby, however.
North Carolina has one of the most generous tax credits for renewables in the United States. While the federal government gives a tax credit of 30 percent for building wind or solar projects, North Carolina tacks on an additional 35 percent credit.
While the amount of the renewable credit given to non-business filers has stayed static, the amount given to businesses in North Carolina has soared. Since 2010 total credits given to businesses have increased over 2,400 percent, rising from $11 million to $268 million in 2014. With the growth rate in credits more than doubling every year, we are likely to see over half a billion in credits granted in 2015 and even more in the next few years as new wind projects come on line and the pace of solar construction increases anticipating an end to tax credits.
The “Desert Wind,” project to be built in Northeastern NC will alone generate nearly $140 million in renewable energy tax credits if construction estimates are accurate. This is equal to nearly all of the business credits issued in 2013.
A $100 million hole in tax collections in 2015 growing to over $200 million in 2016 and increasing dramatically are the effects of these credits. While some liberal advocates worry about the impact of the 2013 tax reform on the state budget, the impact of the renewable energy credits on the state budget will be dramatic and with no corresponding revenue flow from new jobs and ongoing investments.
The credits are transferrable, and as such are often sold to companies for cash, and the largest users of these credits are actually big banks and insurance companies, such as Bank of America, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BB&T, and Duke Energy.
Legislative mandates and tax credits for a specific industry, such as renewables, distort the market. They also incentivize those getting the tax benefits, primarily solar and wind companies, to hire lobbyists to ensure the revenue stream continues flowing. Without these tax breaks and mandates their business model does not work.
http://nccapitolconnection.com/2015/08/25/renewable-mandates-mean-nc-taxpayers-pay-twice/
August 26, 2015 at 1:58 pm
Richard L Bunce says:
Climate change, green energy, etc seems more about increasing government revenues than reducing CO2. Any renewable energy that is cost effective is welcome by me offshore, near shore, onshore... as is the necessary supporting electrical transmission infrastructure as well as the reduction/elimination in Federal, State, and Local government regulations that prohibit it's use especially micro generation by private property owners. I suspect many of the green energy champions would not support such comprehensive deployment.