Mayor pledges 'solution' after police stop some charities feeding Raleigh homeless
Published August 26, 2013
By Andrea Weigl, News and Observer, August 25, 2013 .
The mayor and a city councilwoman pledged Sunday to find a solution after police barred charitable groups from feeding the homeless in downtown Raleigh’s Moore Square during the weekend.
In the last month or so, police have been telling these volunteers to pack up their buffet tables, slow cookers and coolers or face being arrested. A city ordinance prohibits individuals or groups from distributing food in city parks without a permit.
Mayor Nancy McFarlane and city council member Mary-Ann Baldwin said Sunday afternoon that at council committee will address the matter this week and that city leaders had not been involved in the decision to end the weekend food distribution.
The issue came to a head this weekend when a police officer told Love Wins Ministries founder Hugh Hollowell not to hand out breakfast biscuits on Saturday morning, as his group has done every weekend for the last six years. Hollowell, whose blog post about the incident went viral via social media, was back Sunday morning speaking to the media about being shut down.
“The city has no provision for these people being fed on Saturdays or Sundays,” Hollowell explained. “I’m going to eat today, but my friends who live outside aren’t going to be so lucky.”
In a statement released Sunday, Raleigh police spokesman Jim Sughrue wrote, “No arrests were made in connection with the feeding activity; people were simply informed of a city ordinance that prohibits the actions some groups have been engaged in at the park. Work is ongoing with those involved, some of whom are developing alternative sites.”
Later in the day, McFarlane released a statement saying neither she nor the city council were involved in the decision. “Raleigh is a progressive city that believes in the values of each of its citizens,” McFarlane said. “We are so fortunate to have dedicated citizens that want to reach out to those in need. We will be taking this issue into the Law and Public Safety Committee immediately to bring all the partners together for a transparent discussion to work out a plan to address the questions surrounding this issue.”
Baldwin, who chairs that committee, said Sunday: “I feel horrible that this happened. I want to find a solution that is collaborative so that we’re doing the smart thing as well as the right thing.”
During the week, Shepherd’s Table Soup Kitchen in downtown Raleigh serves lunch to the hungry and the Salvation Army, which has relocated just north of downtown in a building on Capital Boulevard, serves dinner. Since neither of those groups serve meals on the weekends, several charities and churches stepped up to serve hot meals and bagged lunches, often setting up on the sidewalk alongside Moore Square.
One person who depends on these meals is Raheem Andrews, who has been a regular at the Love Wins breakfasts since 2009.
“Personally, I have a somewhere to lay my head but that doesn’t mean I have food in my kitchen all the time,” Andrews explained. “I understand downtown is getting bigger. I feel like they are trying to flush us out and get rid of the riff-raff. I don’t know where they’re going to run us to.”
Hollowell’s nonprofit is one of several which have been informed by police officers in recent weeks that such philanthropy is no longer allowed on the sidewalk along the city park.
Church in the Woods founder Alice McGee was told by police to stop in mid-July and for several weeks her group was serving meals in the parking lot of the Salvation Army building, across the street from Moore Square. Last year, the city council decided to purchase the former Salvation Army headquarters for $2.1 million as part of a broader redevelopment effort on the eastern side of Moore Square.
Late last week, McGee and Hollowell say, city officials notified them that the land sale was complete and their charities could no longer use the parking lot as a staging area to feed the homeless.
“We were kicked out yesterday with no notice,” said McGee, whose group serves 1,500 meals a week all over Wake County. “We would love the city to make some suggestions on where would be a more appropriate place.”
Late Sunday morning, another outreach group called Human Beans Together scrambled to set up lunch in a nearby parking lot, owned by McLaurin Parking, and outside Mo’s Diner. Volunteer Todd Pratt said he had tried to contact the lot’s owners late Friday to get permission to use it beforehand but instead paid for the parking spaces they used.
While lunch was being served, a Raleigh police officer stopped by to tell Pratt and other organizers that Bill McLaurin, the lot’s owner, was on his way to speak to them. A few minutes later, McLaurin arrived and had a conversation with Pratt and other organizers.
Afterward, McLaurin told reporters that another group has permission to use the lot to feed the homeless. McLaurin said he was willing to talk to the Human Beans Together folks about using the lot, but added that the group will have to arrange for liability insurance in case someone gets injured on the property when they are using it.
August 26, 2013 at 9:07 am
Norm Kelly says:
Perhaps that is part of the problem. Once again, government trumps everything else.
It seems that progressive cities around the country are the ones that put restrictions on private groups & individuals actually getting out & helping people. Government agencies, at every level, hate competition. Only government should be helping hungry & homeless people. This is disgusting at every level. Property that is NOT being used for any other purpose ought to be allowed to be used for charitable purposes. Does common sense exist anywhere in government these days?
I know it's from another N&O editorial, posted elsewhere on this blog, but praising Jerry Brown, while denouncing Pat McCrory just shows how much support "progressives" get from their insiders. I don't see anything about progressives that deserve praise. This shutdown of food giveaway by charitable, private groups, is one example of progressivism.
The mayor & a council member supposedly said "city leaders had not been involved in the decision". Really? Where do city ordinances come from? Someone, somewhere just made a rule that the police are expected to enforce? Who are the members of this "invisible hand of government" that gets to make up rules that elected officials don't know about? Isn't it about time that voters should expect elected officials to take some sort of responsibility?
The N&O goes on & on & on (and then some!) about McCrory & his administration being out of touch & out of control. But do they say anything about those invisible government groups that seem to do things without oversight or control? Do they say anything about the troubles that "progressives" make? Do they say enough about people in government jobs that screw up big time, and simply get put on paid administrative leave? (Like paid admin leave is a punishment! How many people in the private sector get extra paid vacation days when they screw up? I've experienced paid admin leave. Except it was unpaid. And it wasn't temporary leave. It was a permanent vacation. That's the way screw ups are supposed to be treated!) Progressives complain when corporate employees are convicted of wrong-doing, but don't do the "perp walk" so the populace can jeer at them, throw things, spit upon them, and basically embarass the daylights out of them. It's about time corporate employees were allowed to stand around the sidewalks to do the same thing when a government screw up gets what's coming to them. Government MUST start taking responsibility for their actions. Better pay, better benefits, still allowed to screw up without fear.
Big tagent? Maybe. Except someone actually was responsible for putting this ordinance in place. The mayor doesn't think so, though.
August 26, 2013 at 8:29 pm
dj anderson says:
Earlier, on WRAL.com it was quoted the city wanted to control the "rodent" problem. We know who the 'rodents' are...the homeless. The city and the city slicker venues around the square want the homeless to move out on downtown blvd near the old bonded warehouse, bound by RR tracks embankments on three sides and a long walk to downtown. They have the Salvation Army out there already.
If Mayor MacFarlane wants to FIX this, then order the permits be given quickly. If someone is giving away food why make them have permits, insurance or anything else. I think I'm going to go down and give someone something this weekend.
There's another side to the homeless begging and hanging out in that park. They dominate it. It does make the location and the clubs, bars and eateries around there less hospitable.
My opinion is that those giving money to the beggars are giving to make themselves feel better and not doing any favors for the homeless, but enabling them to exist, but not improve. I stopped and gave my standard bag of roasted peanuts to a lady on the corner today. She had a toddler with her. I went back with a Bojangles egg, tomato and onion biscuit. She said she didn't need food, but money. We asked if she had a home to go to tonight. YES, staying with a friend. I don't know if she was just trying to make money or was desperate in some way other than food or shelter. We suspect a man put her there with child in tow to make money, but we don't know. This has been on my mind since. It's one thing to talk about the faceless homeless, but another when you are looking in that face and there's a little child. As we went back a second time, we had decided to carry her to a shelter and get her into a program, and if that didn't work, take her home, which is scary in many ways. I've done it before and it never seems to fix anything.
This is the kind of story that is going to light fuses in lots of people. I say, get the law off the books, or sell it to the public.