Income inequality would be King's message today

Published January 19, 2015

Editorial by News and Observer, January 19, 2015.

The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. feels present today as he comes to life in the film “Selma,” and his message echoes in the protests over African-Americans who died in confrontations with white police officers in Ferguson, Cleveland and New York. As art and protest summon the memory of the great civil rights leader, it is an interesting exercise to wonder what he would think if he could truly walk among us again. What if the man assassinated in 1968 could materialize in 2015 and see what has transpired in the nearly half-century since his death?

No one can say with certainty what King would see and say about the nation of today. But his actions and words give clues about what his impressions and concerns might be.

Segregated and poor 

In his “I Have a Dream”  speech of 1963, he described the stark reality of the conditions blacks faced in a largely segregated nation. Speaking of the century since the Emancipation Proclamation, he stood before the Lincoln Memorial and said:

“[O]ne hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. And so we’ve come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.”

King likely would be impressed by how the nation has changed since he spoke. Segregation as a policy or political view is gone. African-Americans are well-integrated into society. A large share of black Americans are now middle class. The son of a black African man and a white woman from Kansas is president of the United States. African-American men and women have become so prominent in so many roles that the phrase “the first black ...” applies in fewer and fewer cases and race sometimes seems not even worth a mention. If he looked in on “Selma,” he would see a film directed by an African-American woman and included in its cast Oprah Winfrey, an African-American talk-show host who became a billionaire.

Race still divides

Yet America is hardly color-blind or without informal segregation. That an African-American can become president is a soaring expression of the American dream, of King’s dream. But the failure of some whites to accept President Obama as their president and the racial subtext beneath the reflexive opposition to anything he proposes speak to the enduring power of race in American politics. Indeed, King might well be stunned to discover that the party of Lincoln is virtually all white and reliant for its political success on the states of the former Confederacy.

And King would be disappointed that, despite the social and economic ascent of many African-Americans, many remain mired in an underclass. Poor blacks still go to all-black and unequal schools, suffer from high crime in their neighborhoods and often face the same contentious relationship with police officers that King condemned as “police brutality.”

King might also be puzzled by the fact that even as African-Americans have gained a greater share of wealth and power, black leaders seem to be less influential. As president of all Americans, Obama is careful to avoid the role of black leader. And beyond him, there is no clear heir to Martin Luther King Jr. as a speaker and leader in the United States. The opportunism of Al Sharpton and his polarizing effect are a mockery of King’s sincere desire to see all races live in harmony.

But what might surprise and disappoint King most would not be the issues of race he addressed in 1963, but the issue of labor and wages he addressed shortly before he was struck down. King went to Memphis to support a strike by sanitation workers. He said in a  speech to them and their supporters: “So often we overlook the work and the significance of those who are not in professional jobs, of those who are not in the so-called ‘big jobs,’ but let me say to you tonight that whenever you are engaged in work that serves humanity and is for the building of humanity it has dignity and it has worth.”

Income inequality grows 

Today King would find his dream and the American dream fading for Americans of all races. Income inequality is hurting all low- and middle-income families.

The Center for American Progress  reports that the average incomes of the top 20 percent of earners grew by 42.6 percent in inflation-adjusted terms between 1979 and 2012, but the average incomes of those in the middle 60 percent grew by only 9.5 percent, and the incomes of the bottom 20 percent actually fell by 2.7 percent.

American democracy seems unable to respond to this trend. State and federal political leaders are increasingly guided by special interests that fuel their ever more expensive campaigns. The Supreme Court has conferred person-hood on corporations while approving changes in campaign financing and voting rights that diminish the influence of real people.

King’s message this King Day might not be a call for the equality of all races, a goal toward which he would see great progress. Rather, he would call for a commitment to equal opportunity and respect for the value of work so that all would have a chance to share in the American dream, his dream.

January 19, 2015 at 9:17 am
Norm Kelly says:

What's the chances if Martin were to come back today he would excoriate those who claim to be leaders of the black community? His hard work, down the toilet because of leaders who claim blacks are incompetent, incapable, and need to be taken care of by kindly, loving white people? Would Martin rail against the policies of the Socialist Party of the US? You know, the policies that help blacks for the only reason that they are black. Policies that say blacks are incapable of getting a picture ID which prevents them from getting to the voting booth. Which Martin would see immediately as a bogus argument, which simply claims, once again, that blacks are inferior to non-blacks, claims they are incapable of proving who they are JUST BECAUSE they are black. Would Martin prove the lie about it being a poll tax by pointing out that kindly, loving white people were willing to pay for the picture ID? Policies of the SocPar that take black voters for granted.

If Martin were to come around today, would he wonder why blacks are lied to by their supposed leaders as well as socialist whites, and the lied-to blacks don't question? When Alsharpton makes up a story about the black giant who was shot after attacking a police officer, that the giant had his hands up when the evidence/witness accounts show otherwise, would Martin publicly denounce Alsharpton? When black groups supposedly ask a sheriff to create 'no-go zones' in black communities in order to create self-policed neighborhoods, would Martin point out that these are self-segregating actions, with the intent to undo what Martin was trying to get done? When blacks in central US cities stop paying for their city water because they believe, as disadvantaged, their water should be paid for by someone else and free to them? Would Martin point out that they are expecting benefits because, and only because, they are black and expect freebies from white people?

How would Martin react to those blacks who claim Ebonics is the natural language of black Americans and that's why so many perform so poorly in English-language school systems? Would Martin point out that this is just another way of saying the same thing racists said in his day about blacks being incapable of learning, that blacks were inferior to whites?

There's a lot to be said about racism around the world. There's a lot to be said about the sad state of affairs concerning supposed black leaders today. Martin expected blacks to be able to perform in society, just as whites were/are able to do. Martin expected blacks to be able to perform just as well as any other human, because they are human just like any other human. Martin wanted blacks to consider themselves capable, educated, successful people able to integrate into the American system. Martin expected blacks could achieve the American dream on their own, not because white's were forced to provide it for them. Martin's message was about equality.

I did not know Martin. Never met the man. But from what I've heard, read, seen about him, Martin thought blacks were capable people, who could survive on their own, as part of American society. From what I've heard, Martin expected blacks to not be separate, apart from American society. From what I've read, Martin wanted blacks to be treated as equal to whites. From what I've seen, Martin wanted blacks to BECOME equal to whites through their own efforts, not because it was given to them by the demon party who thought of blacks as inferior and only capable of success because of stipends from the government. Martin wanted society to see blacks as equal, and give blacks equal access to success. What black 'leaders' and the demon party have today is an expectation that blacks NEED help from whites in order to have anything. Without the SocPar, blacks would completely fail to survive. That is, according to the SocPar as well as supposed black 'leaders' we see today.

Enough reading of N&D blathering. I have a life to live, and a job to do. Have to work for a living in order to put food on the table.

January 19, 2015 at 9:42 am
Richard Bunce says:

"The Supreme Court has conferred person-hood on corporations while approving changes in campaign financing and voting rights that diminish the influence of real people."

Luckily for the News & Observer editorialists, the The McClatchy Company (NYSE: MNI), a for profit corporation which owns the The News & Observer Publishing Company which publishes the N&O, would also have their First Amendment press protections while performing press functions within a for profit corporation using corporate resources just as the USSC ruled in the Citizen's United decisions that persons do not lose their First Amendment speech protections when speaking within a corporate structure using corporate resources.

January 19, 2015 at 9:44 am
Richard Bunce says:

Does the for profit N&O publishing a newspaper using corporate resources diminish the influence of real people as well?

January 20, 2015 at 2:39 am
Vicky Hutter says:

Excellent comments Norm.