How long will being gay be a fireable offense?

Published September 19, 2014

By Chris Fitzsimon

by Chris Fitzsimon, NC Policy Watch and NC SPIN panelist, September 18, 2014.

North Carolina Congressman Robert Pittenger made headlines recently for suggesting that firing people from their jobs solely because they are gay is one of the “freedoms we enjoy” as Americans.

Pittenger’s startlingly offensive remarks came as supporters of a federal employment non-discrimination act that would protect gay workers on the job are trying to force a vote on the proposal in the U.S. House.

Pittenger first made the comments to a national reporter after a town hall event and the Charlotte Observer reports that he stood by them in a meeting with the paper’s editorial board, saying that hiring and firing decisions should be left to the free market and “government intervention is not the best solution to matters of the heart.”

Matters of the heart? Discrimination apparently should be left to the emotions and biases of the employer in Pittenger’s view of the world. The Observer also reports that Pittenger did not directly respond when asked if employers should be allowed to fire someone for being African-American.

That may be a matter of the heart too for the congressman.  Guess we should repeal the 1964 Civil Rights Act while we’re at it.

Pittenger is not alone of course. Republican leaders in Raleigh like House Speaker Thom Tillis and Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger seem to agree with him.

Senator Josh Stein introduced legislation this session in the General Assembly to prohibit employment discrimination against LGBT workers.  Four House members introduced a companion bill in the House.

Neither proposal even received a hearing in the House or Senate, much less a vote. That means gay and lesbian workers in North Carolina, who most likely will soon be able to get married thanks to the federal courts, might want to think twice about putting a picture of their spouse on their desk at work.

It could be a fireable offense, depending on the “heart” of their boss.

It simply shouldn’t be this way in a civilized society and it is not in the 21 states that prohibit employment discrimination against LGBT workers. And President Obama recently issued an executive order banning employment discrimination in the federal government and at companies that receive government contracts. Good for him.

But in North Carolina, there are no such protections, thanks to Tillis and Berger and legislators like Rep. Paul Stam, who just a few months ago passed out a document on the House floor listing pedophilia, necrophilia and bestiality as “sexual orientations” during a debate about banning charter schools from discriminating against gay students.

Lawmakers ultimately passed a charter school bill that did not include the anti-discrimination protections. And it was just a few years ago during the debate over the marriage discrimination amendment that Stam and many of his colleagues stood at rallies beside homophobic zealots who said gay people are an abomination and are going to hell. What’s in their hearts?

Governor Pat McCrory supported the marriage discrimination amendment but has been noticeably silent on the issue of employment discrimination. Somebody should ask him where he stands.

The Observer cited a Pew Research Center survey last year finding that more than one in five LGBT respondents said they were treated unfairly by an employer in hiring, pay or promotions.

This is not a matter of the heart, Rep. Pittenger. It is a matter of people in North Carolina currently being denied their fundamental civil rights because of who they are and who they love.

That brings to mind a lot of things, but freedom is not one of them.

http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2014/09/18/how-long-will-being-gay-be-a-fireable-offense-in-north-carolina/

September 20, 2014 at 11:09 am
Norm Kelly says:

So, what makes more sense: protecting everyone in an employment situation OR picking & choosing which groups are in a protected class? Should anyone be HIRED or fired because of their sexual orientation? Should anyone be HIRED or fired because of the color of their skin? Should anyone be HIRED or fired because of their religion? Obviously the answer to everyone of these question is NO! But what do we find libs doing? Creating legislation specifically targeting favored groups. It's not that the libs/socialists are trying to protect everyone. It's that libs/socialists are trying to create SPECIAL protections for groups that they want to vote for demon candidates. Once again, this is more about buying votes by the demon pols than it is about actually doing anything worthwhile.

If I am a pastor and run a church, NO GOVERNMENT AGENCY should be involved in the hiring and firing process. I should be able to hire ANYONE I choose to hire based solely on the job interview and their RELIGION! Because in a church environment, everyone on staff should be of the same religion and support the religious teachings of my church. It does not matter if the government wants me to have specific percentages of ANY group represented. What matters is whether they all support the religion that I teach at my church.

Just because someone is queer does not mean they should be discriminated against. But it also does not mean that they get special treatment. (yes, i used the politically incorrect term to describe these people. i don't have to cave to your use of the word 'gay'. which used to mean happy. which is the way i prefer to use it. 'queer' is a more appropriate description of those who prefer people of their own sex over people of the opposite sex. like nature intended it. it's not my problem if you get caught up on my use of that word. if you ignore the rest of my response because of that word, then it's your challenge not mine!)