Higher education is a new civil right

Published October 23, 2016

by Margaret Spellings, UNC President, published in Greensboro News-Record, October 22, 2016.

What if all North Carolinians reached their full potential? What would that mean for our state, and what would it take to get us there?

What if all of our citizens could get the kind of education they need? What would it mean for their lives and careers — for their families, for their children?

And what would that mean for our economy? For the civic and cultural life of our state? For our competitiveness and prosperity?

If those questions seem daunting, imagine what this university’s original charge must have sounded like back in 1776, when the ink had barely dried on the Declaration of Independence and Chapel Hill was still a tree-covered hillside. Our state’s founders declared, “All useful Learning shall be duly encouraged and promoted in one or more Universities.”

That, too, was a revolutionary idea. It was a monumental goal then, and it is an even bigger challenge to us now.

What is “all useful learning” for a student today?

We know the world is more competitive, and the best jobs of the future demand education beyond high school. We know there is promise and potential in every corner of this state — in every town, every district, every classroom. And we know that economic and social mobility help define the American Dream.

So, are we doing all that we can to create opportunity for everyone? To deliver on the promise of all useful learning?

We have a constitutional mandate to provide a quality education as free as practicable. At his own inaugural some 30 years ago, President Dick Spangler defined that promise simply: No one in our state is denied a college education because of lack of money.

Are we keeping that historic promise and living up to that ideal? Or has that challenge only deepened?

I don’t raise these questions because I doubt the greatness of the University of North Carolina. I raise them because I believe in it so deeply.

A new civil right

In the 18th century, North Carolina took the lead in recognizing higher education as the foundation of a free society.

Today, we must lead again in recognizing quality higher education as a new civil right — a vital part of our founding promise.

That means making education beyond high school possible for all. That’s never been done before — not here, not anywhere else. But it’s plainly needed if our state and our people are going to thrive in the century ahead.

We have one of the finest university systems in the country, what former President Bill Friday called a mighty engine, sustained by generations of hard work and patient investment.

But we also have too many citizens whose lives and ambitions are limited by geography, by income, by struggling K-12 schools or by tuition that seems out of reach. It can be easy to forget when you live in a thriving region or graduate from one of the state’s top high schools, but most North Carolinians don’t have a college education or the opportunities that come with it.

The opportunity to pursue an education beyond high school is far from equal across our state. A high school senior in one county can be twice as likely to earn a college degree as a classmate in a neighboring district. Statistics are not destiny, but a few miles can make a world of difference. We can’t allow a child’s future to be dependent on ZIP code. Nor can we afford to let economic hardship limit potential.

Today we are leaving behind thousands of capable students who never even apply to college because it doesn’t seem possible for them. Low-income students enroll in college at far lower rates than their wealthier peers, even when test scores and academic performance are the same. That’s a tragic waste of talent, and we must do something about it.

At a time when our state and our nation are growing more diverse — when the school-age population in North Carolina is almost 50 percent minority and growing — we cannot tolerate pernicious gaps in opportunity.

History of big things

I have faith that we can meet these challenges because we’ve done big things before. In 1940, after years of a grinding depression and with a world war breaking out, fewer than one in four Americans had a high school diploma. Our nation stood on the brink of enormous technological and global change, facing a future we couldn’t possibly predict. Yet instead of being paralyzed by uncertainty, leaders at every level responded with confidence in the capacity of our people. We didn’t limit our expectations — we raised them.

That far-sighted decision helped drive the growth and prosperity of the last century. The dedicated expansion of public schooling allowed the United States to build the best-educated, most highly skilled society the world had ever seen.

Today, nearly nine in 10 Americans have a high school diploma. Their lives are better for it, our democracy is stronger, and our economy is the wealthiest and most innovative in the world. Mass public education was an American invention that underpinned the American century.

We must raise expectations

It’s time to raise our expectations again. Higher education is a new civil right. Every child must be able to reach beyond high school. That has to become our expectation, our promise for a rising generation.

That may mean a four-year degree, a master’s or a doctorate; it could also mean an associate degree or a professional credential. Whatever form it takes, quality higher education has become a critical measure of our standing in the world. After a century of leading the way, we’ve begun to fall back.

For our most vulnerable students, the cost of higher education is daunting. We know that college can be life-changing for those who graduate, opening a world of possibility that echoes across generations. But it can also be life-altering for those who don’t graduate, leaving them indebted and adrift. As the cost of college has risen, so too has the cost of failure.

The rising cost of higher education has outpaced inflation, health care and just about everything else. Public anxiety has risen along with it. Of course, the payoff is still there for those who are prepared to do the work and finish on time, and North Carolina’s public universities remain a remarkable value. Strong state support has kept our public colleges among the best and most affordable in the country.

But for too many students — those who borrowed and didn’t graduate, those who spent too much time and money before finding their way — the payoff is harder to see.

Our system too often fails those who come from rural, low-income, first-generation and minority families. They are the students most likely to leave school with debt but no degree, to take longer than necessary to graduate, to languish in expensive remedial classes or to forgo college altogether.

As long as we tolerate such divides in opportunity, the fundamental promise of public education remains unfulfilled.

We must make known the lasting value of quality higher education to a public that has grown more skeptical, to lawmakers facing difficult choices, and to students and families making one of the biggest decisions of their lives.

Defining success

As president of this university, my job is to help define success — what does it mean to be accessible, affordable and efficient, to have excellent and diverse institutions, and to make a real impact on the economy and well-being of North Carolina? How do we define student success and hold ourselves accountable for achieving it?

Answering those questions will mean thinking differently about how we meet students wherever they are and prepare them well.

We must adapt the way we teach, the way we advise, the way we mentor and guide students. We must give people choices about the kind of education that works best for them.

That means straightforward tools and information about borrowing, about the career prospects for different degrees and majors, and about the expectations for success at each of our institutions.

We must explore new ways of making education available to working men and women, to returning veterans, to parents and professionals. We need creative partnerships with community colleges, local governments, businesses, nonprofits, faith-based organizations and civil rights leaders to raise our expectations of higher education for all.

Teaching teachers

Many of our institutions were founded as teacher’s colleges, and UNC is still the single largest source of teachers for our public schools. We need to strengthen their work through research, professional development and deeper connections between K-12 classrooms, community colleges and the university.

We all share a stake in this. A better-educated state holds the promise of a stronger economy and a greater quality of life — public goods in every sense. And I know we’re equal to the task.

Our campuses are home to some of the brightest, most creative, most dedicated people in the world. I’ve had the privilege of meeting many of them in my travels, and seeing firsthand what a remarkable place this is.

With 17 unique institutions working toward a shared mission, we have the scale and the imagination to tackle any problem.

The big questions I’ve raised aren’t rhetorical. I really want to know what it would mean to educate every person in this state to their fullest ability, what it would take to renew our constitutional mandate for a new generation, to redefine all useful learning for a new era. I believe it would mean a stronger public life. Democracy has never been easy or simple, which is why education is among the first responsibilities of citizenship.

It would mean a more resilient economy, with more of our people ready to face a changing world. And it would mean greater hope. For students and their families, expanded access to college means the freedom to choose their own paths, to shape their own lives and ambitions.

http://www.greensboro.com/opinion/columns/margaret-spellings-higher-education-is-a-new-civil-right/article_12223df6-8ecb-5d8d-aba7-95ff140990fd.html

October 23, 2016 at 10:30 pm
Richard L Bunce says:

Real skills and knowledge... not junk degrees prevalent in our post secondary education system over many decades now... and no I do not want a government bureaucrat deciding what are or are not degrees and skills worth supporting... employers should have a big say in that... and can sponsor students with a tax credit.

October 23, 2016 at 10:56 pm
Norm Kelly says:

Health care is a right.

According to the current unqualified community organizer socialist mostly black occupier a cell phone is a right.

According to the same lacky, the Internet is a right.

Now we're hearing higher education is a right?

Give me a break! What WON'T fall into the category of a 'right'? Will a house become a right? Will a job become a right? Will a large flat screen tv become a right? Will a car become a right? What exactly WON'T fall into the category of a right? Be honest.

First major question: how will it be paid for? Second major question: who will pay for it?

When it comes to education we need to keep in mind who runs, manages, controls higher education. Completely. Totally. To the exclusion, purposeful exclusion, of any alternative group, opinion, options. It's LIBS! Who has mismanaged higher education? LIBs. Who has made higher education cost prohibitive? LIBs! Who has insisted that no one but an educator can run/control/manage education? LIBs. Who now comes forward to offer their opinion on a solution? LIBs. At some point we have to take control back and remove libs from their position of authority. Giving libs even more power, control, authority over our purse/wallet will only bring disaster.

Look at what LIBs have done to health care. Socialist VA Health care that is failing miserably. Now we have Obamasocialist medicine for the masses. Is that working? If you define 'working' as destroying the entire health care industry in the nation, then yes, it's working. What is the lib solution to failure of Obamasocialism? An entire total 100% take over of the entire medical industry: they call it Single Payer. Why? Because it sounds better than 'socialized medicine'. More people can be duped into accepting 'single payer' than can be duped into accepting 'socialized medicine'.

So, if the 'right' of health insurance, the right of a cell phone, the right of the Internet has screwed up those areas of life as much as it has, what makes anyone think allowing LIBs to have more power, control, authority over destroying higher education is a good idea?

Who allowed higher education to get so expensive? LIBs. Who insists that 'professors' who don't spend time in the classroom should get paid outrageous sums? LIBs. Who insists that there be as many at the top as in the entire rest of the system? LIBs.

Have I read the entire post? Nope. When the post starts with such a bogus concept as higher education being a right,to the point of bankrupting citizens, the rest of the post is pointless. In the end it simply means that money I earn will be stolen from me so someone else can benefit. Someone who was chosen by some do-good soft-hearted lib.

At what point do tax payers revolt against allowing our earnings to be stolen from us cuz it makes LIBs feel good? When do we stop caring about LIB feelings and start caring about allowing life to be better FOR EVERYONE? Just cuz you steal from me & give to someone else does not mean anyone is better off! Stop STEALING from me just to make yourself feel good!

(and, yes, libs in education do exclude alternative opinions. libs prevent conservatives from appearing on campuses. libs prevent conservative groups from organizing. libs shout down any conservative brave enough to stand up. libs deny there even is an alternative opinion. libs are now wanting to take legal action against thinking people who know that man-made global climate change is bogus. how's that for excluding alternative opinions? and hildaliar whines about donald? it's hildaliar and her supporters that are the deplorables. but she gets away with it, and i'll get hate 'mail' and maybe even edited for posting this.)