Health care law to crimp US hiring

Published December 12, 2013

by Rick Smith and Renee Chou, WRAL, December 11, 2013.

Corporate financial chiefs say they expect to reduce hiring and also move more jobs to part-time status as a result of the Affordable Care Act, according to a new survey from Duke University and CFO Magazine.

Many companies also are considering a reduction in health care benefits for employees.

"The results were startling to us. This will significantly impact employment," said Campbell Harvey, a professor of finance at Duke's Fuqua School of Business. "I think the people who drafted the bill probably never anticipated such a negative effect on employment, especially in a time when we really need employment growth."

Almost half of the 500 companies surveyed are "reluctant" to hire full-time employees, the survey found, and one in 10 may lay off current employees in response to the law.

Some people could see their hours cut below 30 hours a week because the Affordable Care Act requires companies with 50 or more employees to provide health insurance to those working 30 hours or more a week or pay a penalty.

More than 40 percent of CFOs surveyed say their companies will consider switching some full-time jobs to part-time jobs in 2014.

"For the employee, often what that means is you have to get a second job, or you just take a hit in the amount of money you make. So, it is quite disruptive," Harvey said.

Fallout also will hit benefits at many companies, with 44 percent of the CFOs surveyed saying they will consider reducing benefits.

Harvey said it boils down to companies trying to cut costs related to the health care law.

"For any policy, there are benefits and there are costs, and this is a cost that we simply need to be aware of," he said.

While the Obama administration struggles to get the HealthCare.gov website running effectively after a botched start, employers are already reacting to how changes in the law are affecting their bottom line.

U.S. unemployment just last month fell to 7 percent – the lowest in five years – but Duke and CFO magazine project only a 1.4 percent increase in hiring in 2014, which they said is unlikely to make a dent in the jobless rate.

“The inadequacies of the ACA website have grabbed a lot of attention, even though many of those issues have been or can be fixed,” said John Graham, a finance professor at Duke who also is the director of the survey. “Our survey points to a more detrimental and potentially long-lasting problem. An unintended consequence of the Affordable Care Act will be a reduction in full-time employment growth in the United States."

Corporate enthusiasm other than health care

Despite concerns about the health care law, 52 percent of U.S. CFOs do enter 2014 expecting the economy to improve. However, that is down from more than 60 percent in the previous quarterly survey.

The biggest concerns among global CFOs include:

  • Maintaining profit margins
  • Finding, hiring and retaining qualified employees
  • Worries about employee morale and productivity.

 

December 12, 2013 at 6:38 am
Jack Dawsey says:

The article and the survey sited by the WRAL writers is Pure T. Gobble-gook and sorely misleading. WRAL ought to be ashamed to attached its name to such an article.

Give me a break!

In the first place, the ACA does not apply to employers with less than 50-employees. And frankly, most small businesses in American and in NC are employers with less than 50-employees. Repeat: ACA DOES NOT APPLY.

Now employers in NC with 50+ employees will not reduce their staff to "part-timers." If they do, they can't blame it on the ACA. If they reduce some employees to "part-time" it's because they don't need "full-timers" in those particular billets in the first place. Besides, employers greater than 50-employees have always (from time to time) resorted to and assigned certain employees to a "part-time" status. The expression "part-time" was not born as a result of the ACA. Part time employment as been with us since the Industrial Revolution. So come on Ms. Chou and Mr. Smith, get your mind right and take off your partisan hat when you write under the pretext of journalism. Before releasing your work for public consumption, insure that is journalism and not "yellow-journalism."