General Assembly should take a practical turn in 2015

Published January 4, 2015

Editorial by News and Observer, January 3, 2015.

The political context as the General Assembly prepares to reconvene this month is not unlike the situation in Washington. The chief executive must show he can advance his agenda with legislative leaders who have not shown him respect, and legislative leaders must avoid swinging so far right it hurts their chances of retaining power in 2016.

But unlike lame-duck President Barack Obama, Gov. Pat McCrory must position himself to run for re-election in 2016. And unlike the do-nothing Congress, the Republican-dominated General Assembly does, and undoes, too much as it pursues an agenda that’s half voodoo economics and half tea party hysteria.

For North Carolina’s sake, we hope the prospect of a presidential election with a larger and more diverse electorate will concentrate the Republican mind. Should the GOP take a more practical and less ideological turn, here are issues that ought to be on the agenda.

•  Budget and taxes. Tax revenue projections indicate that Republicans cut taxes too deeply in 2013. Revenue is running hundreds of millions of dollars less than expected. Meanwhile, there’s virtually no evidence that lower taxes on corporations and high-income individuals are drawing more corporations to locate here or prompting more spending by the wealthy that trickles down in the form of more jobs and better pay for middle- and lower-income North Carolinians.

The General Assembly should adjust the tax code to capture more revenue from where most of the recovery’s wealth is going: corporate profits and capital gains by those heavily invested in the record-breaking stock market. Lawmakers also should adopt tax changes Democrats can support in terms of closing tax-code loopholes and eliminating special exemptions. The only alternative to changing the tax code is further cutting a state budget that is already insufficient.

•  The justice system. The third branch of government has long been neglected with regard to funding, but the situation has become acute under Republican rule. The state must invest more to reduce court docket backlogs with better informational technology, especially electronic filing, and more court-related staff. The state’s Chief Justice Mark Martin has made it a priority to lobby for more funding for the court system. His fellow Republicans in the legislature should listen to him.

Meanwhile, the state’s prisons are struggling to provide humane treatment for a wave of mentally ill inmates dumped into the system because of a lack of mental health treatment facilities. Those inmates now number 4,600, or 12 percent of the state prison population. The conditions some of these inmates endure, many of them in solitary confinement, are a scandal that would shock Dorothea Dix, who advocated better care of the state’s mentally ill in the 19th century. That it’s still an issue in the 21st century should shame the state’s government and all of us.

•  Education. The annual whittling of the state’s support for the University of North Carolina system has to stop. Shrinking state support is shifting the burden to student tuition, saddling young people with debt and reneging on the state constitution’s promise to provide higher education to North Carolinians at an affordable cost.

Meanwhile, the state’s public school system is being choked for funds. The legislature gave teachers an election-year raise in 2014, but those raises must continue until average salaries at least match the national average. Local school systems are also straining under reduced state funding. Properly funding public education is a basic obligation of the General Assembly. Lawmakers should meet it.

•  Medicaid expansion.North Carolina remains part of a shrinking group of states – now down to 23 – that refuse to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. Holding out is costing the state billions of dollars in federal aid and inhibiting the ability of hospitals to offer a full range of care. It’s time for lawmakers to give up an anti-Obama protest that only hurts the state. The math is plain. The need is clear. Expand Medicaid.

January 4, 2015 at 10:54 am
Richard Bunce says:

Dog bites man story... N&O favors increased tax rates and increased State government spending... I guess they have put their "Elections have consequences" mantra on the shelf until the next Democratic election surge.

January 4, 2015 at 11:43 am
Norm Kelly says:

Is there still ANYONE in the state who doubts the liberal slant of the Noise & Disturber? I'm being kind by saying it's only a 'liberal slant'. We all know this rag is simply a mouthpiece for the socialists in politics. So, now we're supposed to take advice from a liberal rag as to how the Republicans should govern? You mean the policies of the left that were rejected by voters are to be implemented/followed anyway? According to left-wing rags, that is. However, what did the most recent electionS show us? The majority of voters have discarded the socialist agenda in favor of the proposals of the Republican party. And, even though the N&D won't admit it, some of the movement toward the RIGHT and the right direction is due to the presence of TEA people. So, we know the bias of the N&D editorial writers, we know they are going to tell us to advance the socialist agenda anyway, the legislature and Congress are supposed to ignore the will of the majority of voters, and they are only telling Republicans this so We can continue to win elections. Really? Be serious!

We know the rag's intent and leanings from the opening paragraphs. Example: ''unlike the do-nothing Congress'. Facts are darn funny things, usually ignored by pols, and ALWAYS ignored by libs. The truth is coming out since the recent loss of socialists across the country. Specifically about Congress. You see, the facts show that the Republicans in the House passed numerous bills intended to spur economic growth, private sector job growth, reductions in deficit spending, and multiple other items, only to be ignored by the ever-senile Harry and the socialists in the Senate. It wasn't a do-nothing Congress. The facts have shown for a long time that it's the Senate that has done nothing. How many budgets has the Senate passed since the occupier moved in? How many bills coming from the House never saw the light of day in the Senate? What change was made in the Senate that allowed demons to pass certain items with only a simple majority instead of a super majority? Now that Republicans have been put in charge of the Senate also, by majority citizen vote, will the demons demand that the policy be changed again so these items require a super majority? And the N&D editorial board will agree with the minority demons in the Senate and claim there's some sort of racial implications to making the change, or not making the change.

'larger and more diverse electorate'. Is this a hope due to the Constitutional violation by the occupier? You know, the one where he grants amnesty to millions of demon voters? Will allowing illegal aliens voting privilege create a more diverse electorate? Is this what the nation needs, more socialist voters? And why is it that anyone who flees from places like Cuba, Mexico, or any south-of-the-border country where laws are meaningless would vote for the demon party. Our elected demons have demonstrated that the law is meaningless if they don't like it. Starting with the occupier, and continuing down the line to his racist attorney general. Both choose to ignore laws that exist and make up rules based on how they 'feel'.

'Lawmakers also should adopt tax changes Democrats can support'. See, told you from the beginning. The point of the N&D is to convince people that even though the socialist plans were rejected by a majority of voters, they want us to believe that getting demon support is paramount. It's critical for our state to ignore the majority and to implement the schemes of the minority anyway. Like elections only have meaning when the demon party wins. Which is, after all, what the occupier claimed. So I guess if it's good for the central planners, it's good for our state leaders as well. Elections be damned, follow the losing path anyway! How does this make sense to anyone? Even the confused, mixed up, permanently set mind of a lib must wonder why conservatives/Republicans would accept this notion. And one would expect the average lib voter/non-pol to also wonder what part of 'elections have consequences' the lib leadership does not understand. I can only hope that some lib voters are clueless as to why the N&D takes this approach. But, they are the N&D afterall!

'a wave of mentally ill inmates dumped into the system because of a lack of mental health treatment facilities'. And who was it that ruled Raleigh when these decisions were being made? Who was it that decided it was illegal for mentally ill persons to be detained in a facility that was designed to help them? Who was in charge when it was decided that mentally ill patients couldn't be forced to take their meds? How long did the demons rule that made up silly rules that are now causing problems that the N&D libs expect Republicans to fix?

'The math is plain'. It would appear not. The cost of socialized medicine is sky-rocketing all the time. Yet somehow, libs/socialists/demons/editorial writers all claim that we need to get on board. Use the VA Health system as a model they told us. Now that the VA health system is showing cracks, they no longer tell us to use this as a model. Except it remains a valid model. What was the central planner 'solution' to the VA health scandal/crisis? The same as it always is for the central planners: spend MORE money on the program even though the money already spent is being mis-spent. So, the solution to providing health insurance to 'the poor' is to expand an already out-of-control program, accept money from a bankrupt central government, and assist the central planners in going broke/more broke. Not even in Colorado does this make sense! Even his HIGHness wouldn't think this makes sense. (drug induced stupor not just implied!) The original, fake estimate of the cost of socialized medicine was less than $1TRILLION. The most recent estimate for the cost of socialized medicine is close to $3TRILLION! In about 3 years, the cost has about tripled! Yet it's still considered a viable program! Only in the mind of a confused, mixed up, socialist does socialized medicine make sense! Can ANY lib use world-wide stats to show us how socialized medicine is BETTER than our system; can any writer at the N&D show proof that socialized medicine anywhere in the world is less expensive than our (mostly) private sector system? Where does the world turn when Ebola breaks out? Where have severely sick world leaders traveled to when they need serious treatment? How does making our system more like their failures help ANYONE? How does tripling the cost help anyone? So, is the math plain? Only if you have been indoctrinated into either the socialist schemes or Communist Core. Which are close relatives!

More socialist drivel from the N&D. Anyone surprised? Should we follow the failed schemes of the left? Obviously not. Cuz elections have consequences. And if libs don't explain how their schemes are better, then they will continue to lose elections. They did an excellent job of explaining their schemes during the most recent election cycle. Their messaging was not bad. It's their message that was bad. It's their message that was rejected by a majority of voters. Whether those voters were legal or illegal doesn't matter any more. The majority decided, and it's time to put the socialist schemes behind us. Let's move forward!

January 5, 2015 at 9:46 am
Frank Burns says:

Taking a practical turn to make Medicaid more efficient does not mean more Medicaid cost. The correct approach is to not expand Medicaid and leave the state holding the bag for Medicaid Admin costs which would be a state responsibility.

Taking a practical turn on public education is to understand why parents are fleeing the public schools and address the problem. Spending more money does not address the problem. It is reforming the University system to reduce costs and that means providing more oversight to see that taxpayers are getting their money's worth. This means if we pay full time professors to teach full time, they better have a full time load of classes. It also means avoiding duplication of programs at state universities. How many of the Universities need a Women's Studies program?

January 6, 2015 at 11:33 am
Richard Bunce says:

Trick question... none of them need a Women's Studies program.