Egypt, Nazi Germany and North Carolina

Published August 3, 2013

By D.G. Martin, One on One, July 28, 2013.

Does the following description of a political situation at the beginning of July apply to Egypt or North Carolina?

**Just a year after winning a decisive election victory and taking power from an entrenched regime that had been in charge for many years, the victors alienated a substantial part of their population. Their undemocratic efforts to deny participation by those people and groups who oppose them were patently undemocratic and unfair.**

It applies to Egypt before the recent ouster of the Muslim Brotherhood-led government. But, arguably, it could apply just as well to North Carolina’s political transformation.

Our state’s political turnaround recently got the attention of another national columnist.

“There was a time,” wrote Neal Peirce of The Washington Post, “when North Carolina was a symbol of Southern enlightenment. Compared to the policies of the old ‘Solid South’--Democratic, conservative, fervidly anti-civil rights--the state embraced relatively progressive policies in such areas as education and race relations.

“No longer… the Tar Heel state is racing to lead the pack in conservative anti-city and implicitly anti-black politics.”

Peirce partially summarized the record, noting a bill that reduces revenue by a half-billion dollars, lowering taxes on high income individuals “while increasing taxes for small business owners and lower-and-middle-class taxpayers,” cutting unemployment insurance coverage, cutting support of elementary education, and repealing the Racial Justice Act.

In Egypt, the actions of the government led to popular uprisings followed by the government’s ouster led by the military.

In North Carolina, the actions of the government led to the protests on Moral Mondays.

“What are the odds that Moral Monday protests or the like will deter North Carolina’s new right-wing politics?” asks Peirce.

“Realistically, very low.” he answers.

Noting the legislature’s efforts to “seize city assets” like the Charlotte airport and Asheville water system, Peirce says, “It’s clear that an ugly ‘reward-friends, punish-adversaries’ politics is in full flower.”

Is there any prospect for change in direction?

Not much, according to Peirce. “Growing Hispanic and other more moderate political voices could offset the trend. But with North Carolina’s legislative districts carefully drawn to entrench the ascendant Republicans, a return to moderation may be years--if not decades--away.”

Somebody might ask, “Where is the Egyptian Army when we need them?”

On the other hand, some political observers point out that, after being out of power for so long, the newly empowered can be forgiven for a few excesses and that, once they are accustomed to the responsibilities of governing, their policies will become more moderate and practical.

The apologists for the ousted Egyptian government made the same argument.

Similar explanations were made to explain away Nazi excesses when they took power in Germany in 1933 according to Erik Larson’s recent best seller, “In the Garden of Beasts: Love, Terror, and an American Family in Hitler's Berlin,” based on the experience of North Carolina native William E. Dodd, who was U.S. Ambassador to Germany during this period.

According to Larson, when the new Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels faced questions about abuse against Jews, he told reporters, “Let me explain how such a thing might occasionally happen,” Goebbels said. “All during the twelve years of the Weimar Republic our people were virtually in jail. Now our party is in charge and they are free again. When a man has been in jail for twelve years and he is suddenly freed, in his joy he may do something irrational, perhaps even brutal. Is that not a possibility in your country also?”

In our state, too?

August 3, 2013 at 9:20 am
Michael Kornegay says:

D. G. Martin's premise, as parroted by all the other insufferable sour-grapes Democrats, that "the NC GOP victors alienated a substantial part of their population" is woefully flawed, which renders their argument null and void. The smattering of indignant "Moral Monday" protestors, as compared to the millions of NC voters who elected the GOP majority legislature, is a false representation of the current NC electorate. And, really Mr. Martin, giving your voice to this type of "Nazi" nonsense is beneath you, sir.

August 5, 2013 at 11:33 am
Jiovanna Louisa says:

The millions of voters you write about are totally out-of-touch and not paying attention. I suggest you read Howard Zinn's The Peoples' History of America so you can make better, more accurate judgments. Mr. Martin is obviously fearful of the fascism infiltrating our society and for good reasons. You need to examine the full scope or picture of our current reality in NC.

August 3, 2013 at 10:37 am
Richard Bunce says:

Nazi reference... you lose.

August 4, 2013 at 1:53 am
Vicky Hutter says:

To: D.G. Martin, I personally find your piece uninformed and insulting to our state and country. How dare you include that ridiculous last paragraph in your "commentary"? Are you that ignorant of what the Nazi's did in WWII? Or were you doing exactly what the protesters do on "Moral Mondays"---hyperbole and agendas in search of issues to garner support and publicity demanding more hand-outs from taxpayers? Actions of the General Assembly and our governor are comparable to the acts of fundamentalist terrorists in Egypt or Nazis in WWII? Unbelievable! You have lost all credibility as far as I am concerned.

August 5, 2013 at 11:24 am
Jiovanna Louisa says:

While we still cling to the First Amendment rights provided by our U.S. Constitution, Mr. Martin can say whatever he pleases particularly as an opinion piece. Additionally, he should never have recently apologized for his column in question.

September 5, 2013 at 11:58 pm
Norm Kelly says:

When liberals can't argue a point on it's merits, they default to name calling and Nazi references. Shame on whoever the guy is who wrote this. (name not worth mentioning due to the mindless drivel that was put forth. intelligence is noteworthy & should be named. otherwise, nameless!)

When liberals want to suppress the masses, the first place they start is with taking guns away from people. Not taking guns away from criminals, but taking guns away from law abiding citizens. It's happened all over the world, just before a dictator starts killing the residents of the country that can no longer defend themselves.

So, let's look at Nazi history and what liberals are trying to do in our country today. See the similarities? If not, go back & check your history again. If so, then you understand why another liberal defaulting to name calling and Nazi references is simply mindless crap put forth by someone who lacks enough intelligence to actually make a valid point. Have I read the whole blog post? Seriously! Why would I do that!?! Mindless drivel should never enter a useful brain. Corruption starts so small, so easy, yet grows like yeast on steroids. I prefer no yeast, and no steroids. I try to get intelligent discourse into my mind, into my reading habits.