Education is not a business

Published September 4, 2013

by Harry Payne, former Commissioner or Labor, NC Justice harrypayneCenter, September 4, 2013.

It has been my honor to attend and, when asked, speak at the funerals of my co-workers at two large state agencies. I am always moved by what I learn of them beyond what is visible in office meetings, heard in hallway pleasantries or asked for in the job description.

The person of whom little leadership or judgment is asked on the job turns out to be of enormous talent, a pillar in the church, a force for good in their community and the matriarch or patriarch of a remarkable family. We are better for the whole of their life and talents.

We must be so much more than just what we are asked to do at work.

Broad knowledge, the ability to teach and inspire, budget and plan, partner and build consensus, and engage community issues are seen in few job descriptions or paychecks but the big ones. However, they are essential in every home that hopes to better the next generation and build, family by family, a better state. A substantial amount of what each generation has gathered and given to the next has come from continually improving public education that is constitutionally available to all.

Gov. Pat McCrory is setting out to narrow the purpose of our public schools. He said he wants “to adjust (his) education curriculum to what business and commerce needs.” If students and their parents want other things beyond job-connected learning, he feels they “should go to private school.” If we limit public schools to merely feeding the current needs of business, we condemn those who cannot pay tuition to the shallow end of the labor pool as available skills, rented at the lowest cost and unable to support much more for their children.

For the General Assembly and the governor to take, in the face of a growing population, thousands of teachers and millions of dollars out of our classrooms dilutes what we offer to most North Carolina children. To grind down teacher pay and expenditures per child so that they match a handful of states at the bottom of the nation reflects thoughtless leadership that is clearly comfortable with less for those who cannot buy more. To refuse teachers a pay raise, rob them of job stability and then cut any bonus for obtaining a master’s degree guarantees departures and further decline.

The shameless, demoralizing rhetoric blaming teachers only serves to draw our attention away from the damage being inflicted upon low- and middle-income families by constraining classroom teachers to offer less to many more students.

If we fund, operate and measure public education like a business, with the purpose of meeting current employment needs as cost-effectively as possible, we leave the rest of what public education has been that is essential to better jobs and generations to chance and those who can pay. The cost of growing this gap is the limiting of possibility for so many lives and what we can invent, cure, teach and be. While it’s wonderful when one chooses to follow a parent’s footsteps, it is a disaster to be stuck in them.

Our current business leaders seem silent when their predecessors could be counted on to fight for a well-educated workforce, strong local markets and healthy communities. With the legislature willing to sacrifice the needs of working people, these leaders have selfishly scrambled to shift much of the risk and cost of doing business onto employees. While business gets tax breaks, employees get gutted unemployment and workers compensation benefits, higher interest rates, limited safety and health protections and a bar to local standards of better wages and benefits. Their new tax advantages come at the expense of those whose future they are taxing by hurting public schools.

Like it or not, we all have a big stake in public education succeeding. There will not be a high-rise office building tall enough or a gated community big enough to insulate the privileged from the broad effect of the bad choices they are making.

 

September 4, 2013 at 9:04 am
Richard Bunce says:

Education is a business. It is in the business of educating a parents child to the parents satisfaction. Government schools are a failed business under the iron fist of the government education industrial complex their primary concern is not the education of a parents child but the stifling of any competition and growing their taxpayer funding where a student is just a number in the funding formula.

September 4, 2013 at 10:06 am
TP Wohlford says:

This guy was the Commissioner of Labor? It is obvious, although not a whole lot less scary, that he was NOT the head of the Dept of Ed. What is is today in this disjointed, rambling article is the work of a bad Dem hack.

1. All labor is subject to the laws of supply and demand. He should know that. What a Dept of Labor does is to prevent the excesses of a Laissez-faire economy in that regard -- basic safety standards and child labor laws, for instance. However, in the case of teachers and professors, there is a glut of people who are qualified to teach (maybe not good at it, but legally qualified).

2. NC has three bright spots in terms of high-income employment -- IT (Research Triangle), medical, and financial services. Nothing that is taught in most of NC's schools, even STEM schools, would prepared me for my current IT job. Is this where I point out that we have NC tax-funded community college courses for beer making, in spite of an employment base of maybe 1000 in beer making in this state? And that anyone wanting to learn welding -- which is in demand -- is relegated to a waiting list?

If the Ed people want to claim that they are all about jobs -- which is what this author claims -- they need to be prepared to jettison a lot of areas of study that would never lead to NC jobs. Which, of course, would be a shame -- no music or drama or humanities classes in that case.

3. "...to draw our attention away from the damage being inflicted upon low- and middle-income families..." Ah yes, the old "we would have lots of professionals and Rhodes scholars coming from the back hills if we only had good teachers" argument. Which is false. Educational outcome is tied to local community values, and if the local values are to go hunting and fishing instead of class (or stay out all night gang-banging), then no teacher, no educational system in the world will fix that. And the quality of teachers that are attracted to a given school district, and the quality of those who ultimately are retained, is one of many results of the local community values. And no amount of money from DC, or Raleigh, will fix that either.