Campaign ad dodges facts, raises financing issues

Published September 13, 2014

by Bob Luebke, Civitas Institute, September 11, 2014.

“I always want my students to start with facts, and the fact is Thom Tillis is terrible for education in North Carolina.”

That’s the beginning of a pointed TV ad featuring Chapel Hill teacher Vivian Connell. The ad is part of a $1.7 million campaign by the National Education Association’s Super PAC, the NEA Advocacy Fund, and it’s airing in 95 percent of the state over a 10-day period.

In it Connell criticizes U.S. Senate hopeful Thom Tillis’ record of spending cuts for education during his time as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives.

I’m glad Connell wants to start with the facts because the ad is missing a few you might be interested in.

Vivian Connell is a long-time public school teacher – who is also an activist with a strong record of statements and involvement. She participated in last fall’s teacher walk-ins. She has also spoken out strongly against charter schools and vouchers and believes both to be a cancer upon the public school system. Connell was recently profiled by both Indy and the News & Observer, in which she vented her frustration at GOP leaders and “the war against public education.“

You might also be interested to know that Vivian Connell is a member of the advisory board of Public Schools First NC, which describes itself as nonpartisan and focusing solely on public education issues in North Carolina. But it’s an affiliate of Blueprint NC, the left-wing umbrella organization behind a memo calling for the Left to attack Republicans, and to “Eviscerate the leadership and weaken their ability to govern” while “crippling their leaders (McCrory, Tillis, Berger etc.).”

I have no problem with Vivian Connell expressing her views. She has every right to do so. She has every right to donate her money to the political party of her choosing (Democratic), and she has. However, I do have a problem with the ad’s implied portrayal of Connell as an average local public school teacher in North Carolina. She is not.

I also have a problem with how the ad was financed. NEA is financed largely through the dues and the contributions of NEA members. In North Carolina those members would be members of the North Carolina Association of Educators (NCAE).

The NEA likes to talk about how the organization serves its members and reflects the diverse political views of its members. Don’t believe it. Polls continually show that teachers are less liberal than the union leadership is.

NEA has known for a long time that its membership does not reflect the diverse political makeup of the country. The fact is 90 percent of NEA political contributions go to Democrats. Are we to believe that 90 percent of NEA or NCAE members are Democrats?

Despite these problems, the money keeps coming in and the political contributions continue.

A few more interesting facts:

In 2012-2013, NEA brought in $387 million in revenue, and the great majority of that was dues revenue. How did NEA spend it? A substantial $44.8 million went to political activities and lobbying, much of which is not reported under campaign finance laws. Remember those figures do not include PAC or political party spending, which legally cannot come from dues.

Where are NEA political contributions going? Overwhelmingly to Democrats. The money-tracking web site OpenSecrets.org said the NEA Advocacy Fund “is a left-leaning super PAC associated with the National Education Association. It spent money heavily against Republican candidates and in support of Democratic candidates.”[1]

Open Secrets also notes that , for the 2014 election cycle, NEA has already given just over $9 million to political candidates – with 98 percent going to Democrats or liberals. NEA ranks sixth on the list of organizations that have given to 2014 political candidates. Historically, NEA is the second-largest contributor to political campaigns among unions.

Compelling union dues from teachers in North Carolina and elsewhere to help fund candidates or causes that members would never agree to support individually is a fraud and an injustice.

There is something, however, that teachers can do to remedy these problems. If you oppose the leftist slant and policies of NEA and Vivian Connell, opt out of NEA’s state affiliate, the North Carolina Association of Educators. There are many reasons to do so. Stop lining the pockets of NCAE executives, who on average earn four times the salary of the average public school teacher. Stop NEA and NCAE from playing politics with your money, and receive a $450 salary increase and send a powerful message in the process. Find out more information at www.NCTeacherFreedom.org.

Those are facts we can all live with.

[1] See OpenSecrets.org. Available at: https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/detail.php?cmte=C00489815&cycle=2014

http://www.nccivitas.org/2014/campaign-ad-dodges-facts-raises-financing-issues/

Read More NC SPIN >>

September 13, 2014 at 2:32 pm
Norm Kelly says:

Lefties continuously complain about the income disparity between employees and management. Having Civitas point out that union members' dues pay about 4 times as much for the union executives as the union members make is a slap in the face to every leftie that whines about private sector pay disparity. Except, since unions are virtually guaranteed to be lefties themselves, the disparity doesn't count. Union members are NOT supposed to be educated about what their union representatives get paid, nor are they supposed to care. The union does SO MUCH good for it's members that pay disparity must be overlooked, and kept secret.

It's those darn, stinkin' private sector companies that we need the government to step in and force them to regulate pay. If it weren't for private sector pay disparity, there wouldn't be any problems in the country. Or so say both the lefties and the union leadership (talk about repeating myself!).

I used to belong to a union. One of the memorable days of my life is when I was able to quit that job and tell the union rep to stuff it. They originally offered to let me BUY a 'get back in jail free' card if I ever wanted to join their union again. When I said words to the rep that I can't type here in response to his suggestion of PURCHASING the card, he immediately rescinded his offer. At some point in the past, I'm sure SOME union served a purpose. These days, I see no purpose for ANY educated person to willingly belong to a union. And for unions and lib pols to prevent me from opting out of my dues supporting leftie candidates that I would never support is unforgivable. What's worse than the Republican legislature trying to get voter fraud under control, or worse than teacher groups telling lies about Tillis? The love relationship between leftie pols and unions. The coercion used by unions to get & keep members. The dishonesty of how dues money is spent. Everything union, basically.

Civitas will receive much hate mail from union members and their leadership for presenting such truthful information. All to be backed by the N&D and lib pols.

September 14, 2014 at 9:19 pm
Curt Budd says:

Back to the original point of the article, I am not a member of NCAE. I dont particularly care what an organizational administrator's opinion is. I only care about what I see every day in my classroom , in my school, in my community, and in my profession. And the policies backed by our current legislature ( led by Mr. Tillis) are undermining all of the above mentioned. My class sizes are increasing. Money for textbooks is miniscule. Respect for the teaching profession is non-existent. Teachers leaving the state and the profession in record numbers is a fact. There wasnt going to be any raises for teachers until teachers rallied together to show their outrage at how public education was being treated. Then he exaggerates the facts of the raise. Just be truthful and honest and he would gain a lot more respect. Actually visit classrooms. There's a novel idea.