A budget of poor choices that threatens the state’s future

Published August 14, 2013

Bt Chris Fitzsimon, NC Policy Watch and NC SPIN panelist, August 13, 2013.

One way to predict how North Carolina will fare in the future is to look at how much lawmakers are willing to continue the investments in the people and vital institutions that helped the help the state grow into a leader in the New South in the last 40 years.

The state made major strides in the last generation by beefing up public schools and higher education, expanding targeted economic development and worker training efforts and creating innovative ways to improve public health and protect the natural environment so essential to the quality of life.

It’s not an accident that North Carolina has been among the fastest growing states in the country and that many areas of the state have been ranked as the best places to live and work and raise a family. Governor Pat McCrory recently touted the latest accolades in his constituent newsletter.

But the state didn’t cut its way to being the best place to live, it took years of intentional public investments. Sadly, the budget passed this year by the General Assembly and signed recently by Governor McCrory again rejects the lessons of the relatively prosperous past.

That’s one of the clear messages from a new report on the final state budget from the N.C. Budget & Center, which points out that state spending as a share of the economy is at a 40-year low. The budget also spends 8.3 percent less than before the Great Recession hit in 2008 when adjusted for inflation.

Education at all levels took a major hit this year, despite the claims otherwise by McCrory and legislative leaders. Education spending fell $260 million short of what was needed to maintain the inadequate funding levels of last year.

The effects of the cuts are reflected in daily headlines in communities across the state, teacher assistants laid off, teaching positions eliminated, and university staffs reduced.

And it’s not just the state’s education system that the budget neglects. The list of damaging cuts and areas that the budget woefully underfunds is long, from early childhood programs to economic development in rural areas to a program that helps people with living with HIV/AIDS get the medicine they need to stay alive.

The budget writers claim that growth in Medicaid spending was responsible for the cuts and the lack of a pay raise for teachers and state employees. But it’s not true. Medicaid spending increased, but lawmakers knew last year the increase was coming and refused to admit it, instead building savings into the budget that were impossible to achieve.

The Budget & Tax Center report points out that lawmakers were able to come up with more than $600 million over the next two years to pay for a tax cut that will go primarily to corporations and the wealthy. That’s money that could be keeping teachers and teacher assistants in the classroom and helping low-income families send their children to college.

The report also documents the smoke and mirrors in the budget—taking money from dedicated funds, relying on unspent dollars to fill recurring holes and increasing fees on thousands of people while lawmakers boast that they cut taxes.

The state budget is nothing more than a list of priorities and policy choices about how to invest public dollars and how much to invest.

Lawmakers do deserve credit for finally coming up with the money to provide some compensation for the living victims of the state’s horrific eugenics program.

But otherwise, this budget makes poor choices from start to finish and threatens the bright future that the people in North Carolina want for their families. Tax cuts for the wealthy and less funding for education are not going to get us there.

August 14, 2013 at 10:23 am
Richard Bunce says:

Chris measures the effectiveness of a government by how much it forcibly confiscates from it's citizens... he is the modern day Sheriff of Nottingham.

August 15, 2013 at 11:29 am
Norm Kelly says:

Right on the money!!!!! Not possible to agree more.

No evaluation of how well the money is spent, if the goal was met, if the money was spent on agency management home maintenance or sent off to some "non-profit" started by the head of the agency. Simply that the program was started and money was spent. To hell with those who had their money confiscated! Intentions are all that count.

August 15, 2013 at 12:40 am
Norm Kelly says:

"increasing fees on thousands of people while lawmakers boast that they cut taxes"

I work therefore I pay taxes. When I earn more, there's a possibility that my taxes will go up because I got bumped into a higher tax bracket.

Alternative: my payroll tax is reduced. WHEN I use a government service, I am charged a fee that is in line with what it cost for that government agency to provide that service.

Should I be penalized for working? Being productive? If an income tax is NOT being penalized, then what should it be called?

A sales tax is a usage tax. A fee is a usage tax. Breathing should not be taxed & the more I breath doesn't mean the more tax I should pay.

It is entirely appropriate that those who use government services pay for those services. Just like it's appropriate for hybrid & electric car drivers to pay a special "tax" or "fee" for driving that type of vehicle. I pay a usage tax when I put gas in my vehicle. Electric/hybrid car drivers pay no such fee, but they still get to use the service provided. So if they want to drive a tax free vehicle, then they should pay a usage fee.

See? Logical. Simple. Easy to understand. Easy to figure out how much I'm going to have to pay or not pay. When I use a service, I pay for it. Just like when I go to Lowe's & buy something bigger than what fits in my car. I rent a truck from Lowe's. I pay a fee for the service they provide. When I go to Home Depot and buy something that fits in my car, I don't pay the usage fee for the rental truck. In this situation, would it make sense to liberals that I should pay the truck rental fee on my purchase so someone else gets to use the truck rent free because they fall into some special category? Don't bother telling me this is a different animal altogether. It ain't. Stop & think.