2014 predictions fell short; some picks for 2015
Published January 4, 2015
by Rob Christensen, News and Observer, January 3, 2015.
Every year I get out my crystal ball and make my predictions of what will happen in politics and government during the coming year. The fact that I am often wrong has never stopped me before and I see no reason why it should stop me now.
First let’s review last year’s predictions, which I must say is a painful exercise.
I predicted that the Republican legislature, battered in the public opinion polls, would move to the center during the election year, and would provide a 2 percent teacher pay hike. The legislature did move to the center but it provided an average teacher increase of 7 percent. I also predicted that lawmakers would restore the additional pay for teachers who earn a master’s degree – a benefit cut in 2013 that had been in existence since the 1940s. It didn’t, although it allowed teachers already enrolled in master’s programs to collect master’s pay when they earn their degree.
I predicted that House Speaker Thom Tillis would win the Republican primary, but would do it in a runoff with the Rev. Mark Harris. As it turns out he didn’t need the runoff.
I predicted Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan would win a tough race against Tillis, riding a wave of Democratic anger about the legislature. Helped by a Republican national wave, Tillis won a close one.
Wrong about races
I predicted the Republicans would retain control of the legislature but lose ground. I predicted the House would go from a 77-43 Republican majority to a 66-52 Republican majority. What really happened is it went to 74-46 Republican. I predicted the Senate would go from 33-17 Republican majority to 29-21 Republican. Instead it went to 34-16 Republican.
I did correctly predict that 7th District Democratic Rep. Mike McIntyre would not seek re-election because his district had been made too Republican. But I incorrectly predicted that state Sen. Malcolm Howard would win the 12th District U.S. House seat that went to state Rep. Alma Adams. I also was wrong about Phil Berger Jr. winning the 6th district U.S. House seat.
With that kind of year, you would think I would retire my crystal ball. But no, that would be the coward’s way out.
No Medicaid expansion
So here are several predictions for 2015.
The North Carolina legislature will not expand Medicaid, the largely federally funded health insurance program for the poor. Gov. Pat McCrory has indicated that he is thinking about it, but conservative legislators – unchastened by voters in the mid-terms – are unlikely to go along.
Although the state will allow drillers to start pulling licenses in April, don’t look for any major fracking operations in North Carolina anytime soon – if ever. The market for shale gas exploration is poor, and North Carolina’s likely reserves are tiny. All the controversy about fracking in North Carolina is likely much ado about nothing.
The legislature will reduce the capital gains tax, rewarding the big donors for financing their campaigns in the mid-term elections. That means there will be little money left over for raises for teachers or state employees – especially given the record tax cuts passed in 2013.
Although there is some discontent within the Republican Party about McCrory, don’t look for a major primary opponent to emerge. It has been 20 years since the Republicans last controlled the administrative branch and it is doubtful they will be looking for a fratricidal primary. If a primary challenge does occur, it would most likely come from Lt. Gov. Dan Forest, the favorite of the tea party wing. But McCrory has been working hard to keep Forest happy.
Who will take on Burr
Sen. Richard Burr, happy in his roost as chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, will begin re-election efforts, postponing any idea of hanging out a lobbying shingle with his buddy, House Speaker John Boehner. Although Burr’s polling numbers are unimpressive, he will likely be a far more formidable opponent for Democrats than was Tillis.
Hagan will not run against Burr. Having gone through a $111 million Senate campaign – which has to be an emotionally and physically draining affair – Hagan will decide not to take on an even more difficult opponent than she faced last time. Democratic choices will likely come down to U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx and McIntyre. My guess is McIntyre will decide to challenge Burr.
We will see plenty of Republican presidential contenders stopping in the state this year because legislators moved the date of North Carolina’s presidential primary so it comes right after South Carolina’s, which is tentatively scheduled for Feb. 13, 2016. Historically, the Tar Heel primaries have been held in May.
North Carolina will once again be one of the nation’s political hot spots in 2016 with the state a major focal point in the races for president, governor and the U.S. Senate. So expect the political ads to begin this year. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.
January 4, 2015 at 6:45 pm
Norm Kelly says:
Since it appears a majority of those willing to get to the voting booth agreed with the majority of legislators, why WOULD the legislators agree to expand socialized medicine? I know libs are getting tired of me referring to their pet scheme as 'socialized medicine'. Sometimes truth hurts. You can call a skunk by another name, but it will still smell the same. Also true for socialized medicine. I'll call it what it is. Just like when I refer to the occupier. I will continue to refer to him as what he is: a racist, socialist, America-hater.
'The legislature will reduce the capital gains tax, rewarding the big donors for financing their campaigns in the mid-term elections'. Isn't it the capital gains tax that has been shown to increase government revenue when it's lowered? (there is a point of no-return for everything, so don't go nuts on me with this statement!) So wouldn't this be a good economic move to lower it, instead of referring to it as payback for donors? Taxes on millionaires are going up in some (most?) lib-ruled states. The result is that people with money, the targets of the libs, are leaving those states. Wouldn't it be nice if some of that money ended up here in NC? People with money tend to invest it. Wouldn't it be nice if they invested it here rather than somewhere else? Seems to me that this would actually boost our economy at the same time it boosted state income. When the occupier stated that he wanted to raise the capital gains tax because it was 'the fair thing to do', he was told that it might actually reduce the government's take. His response was that might be true but it was still the fair thing to do. So, the effect is negative for the budget, but positive for the hatred of 'the wealthy'. Is this the idea being put forth in this editorial. It's the right thing to attack 'the wealthy' even if it does nothing to help the poor, help the teachers, or increase tax revenue?
Oh, I am sooooo looking forward to such an early start to the next campaign! Thank God I have Hulu Plus & Netflix. This way I can avoid it all! And regardless of which demon decides to run against Burr or McCrory, their ads won't be worth hearing. The drivel put forth will simply be a carbon copy of N&D editorials. Or is it the other way around? Most of the time it's impossible to tell the difference. The lib ads will pit 'the wealthy' against 'the poor'; all of their schemes will be targeted 'for the children'; they will propose new taxes on 'the wealthy'; they will claim racism about EVERYTHING done by EVERY Republican; and they will continue to demonize TEA people. Their message will be clear, which is what they complained about in the recent election cycle. But, hopefully, enough people will pay attention to what they do rather than what they say and reject their socialist schemes once again. Oh, and their ads will target 'the elderly' against the 'working class'. And they will promise to expand and 'fully fund' Obamacancer. All of which is useless, a waste of time to listen to/watch. All of which will destroy our country and take away our individual freedoms. Which is the very clear message the socialist party put forth in the most recent election cycle. They didn't suffer from bad messaging, they suffered from bad message!
January 5, 2015 at 9:48 am
Frank Burns says:
Your predictions would probably be more accurate if you don't taint them with wishful thinking.